METY.L vs. JEPQ.L
METY.L (IncomeShares META Options ETP) and JEPQ.L (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - METY.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while JEPQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, METY.L returned -23.21% vs 28.89% for JEPQ.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. METY.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.L.
Performance
METY.L vs. JEPQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METY.L achieves a -18.12% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ.L's 8.75% return.
METY.L
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- 6.11%
- YTD
- -18.12%
- 6M
- -16.59%
- 1Y
- -23.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEPQ.L
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- 8.75%
- 6M
- 10.24%
- 1Y
- 28.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METY.L vs. JEPQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
METY.L IncomeShares META Options ETP | -18.12% | 6.34% | 2.01% |
JEPQ.L JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 8.75% | 14.77% | 2.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between METY.L and JEPQ.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2024 | 0.53 |
The correlation between METY.L and JEPQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METY.L vs. JEPQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
METY.L
JEPQ.L
METY.L vs. JEPQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares META Options ETP (METY.L) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METY.L | JEPQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.47 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 3.48 | -4.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 15.39 | -16.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METY.L | JEPQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.79 | 2.41 | -3.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.18 | 1.08 | -1.26 |
Drawdowns
METY.L vs. JEPQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METY.L drawdown since its inception was -39.94%, which is greater than JEPQ.L's maximum drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METY.L and JEPQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METY.L | JEPQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.94% | -20.10% | -19.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.94% | -8.28% | -31.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.46% | -0.84% | -31.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.37% | -2.77% | -11.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.02% | 1.87% | +19.15% |
Volatility
METY.L vs. JEPQ.L - Volatility Comparison
IncomeShares META Options ETP (METY.L) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L) at 1.99%. This indicates that METY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METY.L | JEPQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | 1.99% | +5.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.68% | 8.97% | +13.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.19% | 11.95% | +17.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.39% | 15.99% | +14.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.39% | 15.99% | +14.40% |
METY.L vs. JEPQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
METY.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
METY.L vs. JEPQ.L - Dividend Comparison
METY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.81%, more than JEPQ.L's 10.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ.L JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 10.20% | 10.06% | 0.74% |
METY.L IncomeShares META Options ETP | 18.81% | 19.94% | 3.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METY.L and JEPQ.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JEPQ.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JEPQ.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for METY.L.
METY.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while JEPQ.L is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for METY.L and 0.35% for JEPQ.L.
Find the right allocation for METY.L and JEPQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer