METY.L vs. AMZI.L
METY.L (IncomeShares META Options ETP) and AMZI.L (IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP) are both Derivative Income funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, METY.L returned -33.97% vs -4.63% for AMZI.L. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.
Performance
METY.L vs. AMZI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METY.L achieves a -27.52% return, which is significantly lower than AMZI.L's -8.95% return.
METY.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -8.57%
- YTD
- -27.52%
- 6M
- -27.10%
- 1Y
- -33.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -8.32%
- YTD
- -8.95%
- 6M
- -8.69%
- 1Y
- -4.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METY.L vs. AMZI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
METY.L IncomeShares META Options ETP | -27.52% | 6.34% | 0.58% |
AMZI.L IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP | -8.95% | 4.42% | 15.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between METY.L and AMZI.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024 | 0.59 |
The correlation between METY.L and AMZI.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METY.L vs. AMZI.L — Risk / Return Rank
METY.L
AMZI.L
METY.L vs. AMZI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares META Options ETP (METY.L) and IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP (AMZI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| METY.L | AMZI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.00 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | -0.17 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | -0.37 | -1.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
METY.L vs. AMZI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METY.L drawdown since its inception was -40.70%, which is greater than AMZI.L's maximum drawdown of -27.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METY.L and AMZI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METY.L | AMZI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.70% | -27.38% | -13.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.70% | -27.38% | -13.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.22% | -15.21% | -25.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.49% | -9.25% | -6.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.04% | 12.42% | +10.62% |
Volatility
METY.L vs. AMZI.L - Volatility Comparison
IncomeShares META Options ETP (METY.L) has a higher volatility of 10.22% compared to IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP (AMZI.L) at 9.27%. This indicates that METY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METY.L | AMZI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.22% | 9.27% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.00% | 23.48% | +0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.27% | 29.18% | +1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.85% | 29.33% | +1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.85% | 29.33% | +1.52% |
METY.L vs. AMZI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both METY.L and AMZI.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.
Dividends
METY.L vs. AMZI.L - Dividend Comparison
METY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.26%, more than AMZI.L's 16.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AMZI.L IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP | 16.59% | 13.65% | 2.45% |
METY.L IncomeShares META Options ETP | 21.26% | 19.94% | 3.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METY.L and AMZI.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
METY.L and AMZI.L have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.
Find the right allocation for METY.L and AMZI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer