METW vs. SHOC
METW (Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF) and SHOC (Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METW is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Ball Metaverse Index, while SHOC is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. METW charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SHOC.
Performance
METW vs. SHOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METW achieves a -8.79% return, which is significantly lower than SHOC's 73.38% return.
METW
- 1D
- 5.19%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- -8.79%
- 6M
- -5.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHOC
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 25.12%
- YTD
- 73.38%
- 6M
- 70.44%
- 1Y
- 149.45%
- 3Y*
- 53.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METW vs. SHOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF | -8.79% | -8.20% |
SHOC Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF | 73.38% | 37.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between METW and SHOC is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.38 |
METW vs. SHOC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
METW
SHOC
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
METW
SHOC
-
Basic Materials
METW
-
SHOC
-
Consumer Cyclical
METW
-
SHOC
-
Consumer Defensive
METW
-
SHOC
-
Energy
METW
-
SHOC
-
Financial Services
METW
-
SHOC
-
Healthcare
METW
-
SHOC
-
Industrials
METW
-
SHOC
-
Real Estate
METW
-
SHOC
-
Technology
METW
-
SHOC
Utilities
METW
-
SHOC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METW vs. SHOC — Risk / Return Rank
METW
SHOC
METW vs. SHOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METW | SHOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.40 | 1.55 | -1.95 |
Drawdowns
METW vs. SHOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METW drawdown since its inception was -40.52%, which is greater than SHOC's maximum drawdown of -37.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METW and SHOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METW | SHOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.52% | -37.54% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -37.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.63% | 0.00% | -27.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.31% | -7.47% | -9.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.92% | — |
Volatility
METW vs. SHOC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METW | SHOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.57% | 31.53% | +11.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.57% | 35.16% | +7.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.57% | 35.16% | +7.41% |
METW vs. SHOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
METW has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SHOC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
METW vs. SHOC - Dividend Comparison
METW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.37%, more than SHOC's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF | 55.37% | 30.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHOC Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF | 0.14% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.65% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METW and SHOC have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SHOC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SHOC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for METW.
METW has the higher dividend yield at 55.37%, compared with 0.14% for SHOC.
METW is categorized as Technology Equities, while SHOC is Semiconductors. METW tracks Ball Metaverse Index, while SHOC tracks Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for METW and 0.40% for SHOC.
Find the right allocation for METW and SHOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer