METW vs. IXC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

METW (Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METW is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Ball Metaverse Index, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Energy Sector Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. METW charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IXC.

Performance

METW vs. IXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METW achieves a -8.79% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 32.22% return.

METW

• 1D: 5.19%
• 1M: 2.24%
• YTD: -8.79%
• 6M: -5.41%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IXC

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: -1.75%
• YTD: 32.22%
• 6M: 30.00%
• 1Y: 48.10%
• 3Y*: 18.84%
• 5Y*: 19.64%
• 10Y*: 10.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METW vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF	-8.79%	-8.20%
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF	32.22%	6.05%

Correlation

The correlation between METW and IXC is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025	-0.20

METW vs. IXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	METW	IXC
Communication Services	23.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

METW vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXC

IXC Risk / Return Rank: 76
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 68
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METW vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	METW	IXC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.40	0.32	-0.72

Drawdowns

METW vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METW drawdown since its inception was -40.52%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METW and IXC.

Drawdown Indicators

	METW	IXC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.52%	-67.88%	+27.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.66%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.93%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-64.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.63%	-4.84%	-22.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.31%	-17.48%	+0.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.20%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	METW	IXC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.50%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.42%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.57%	18.75%	+23.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.57%	23.50%	+19.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.57%	26.85%	+15.72%

METW vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

METW has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IXC's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

METW vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison

METW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.37%, more than IXC's 2.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF	2.79%	3.68%	4.56%	3.45%	4.76%	3.98%	4.86%	7.00%	3.51%	3.05%	2.86%	3.77%
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF	55.37%	30.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METW and IXC in my portfolio?

METW and IXC have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, METW or IXC?

On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, METW or IXC?

IXC is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for METW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METW or IXC?

METW has the higher dividend yield at 55.37%, compared with 2.79% for IXC.

What is the main difference between METW and IXC?

METW is categorized as Technology Equities, while IXC is Energy Equities. METW tracks Ball Metaverse Index, while IXC tracks S&P Global Energy Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for METW and 0.46% for IXC.