METW vs. FENY
METW (Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF) and FENY (Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METW is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Ball Metaverse Index, while FENY is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Energy Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. METW charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FENY.
Performance
METW vs. FENY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METW achieves a -8.79% return, which is significantly lower than FENY's 32.28% return.
METW
- 1D
- 5.19%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- -8.79%
- 6M
- -5.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FENY
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 32.28%
- 6M
- 29.37%
- 1Y
- 45.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.48%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
METW vs. FENY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF | -8.79% | -8.20% |
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 32.28% | 3.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between METW and FENY is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | -0.19 |
METW vs. FENY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
METW
FENY
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
METW
FENY
-
Basic Materials
METW
-
FENY
Consumer Cyclical
METW
-
FENY
-
Consumer Defensive
METW
-
FENY
-
Energy
METW
-
FENY
Financial Services
METW
-
FENY
-
Healthcare
METW
-
FENY
-
Industrials
METW
-
FENY
Real Estate
METW
-
FENY
-
Technology
METW
-
FENY
-
Utilities
METW
-
FENY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METW vs. FENY — Risk / Return Rank
METW
FENY
METW vs. FENY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METW | FENY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.40 | 0.20 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
METW vs. FENY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METW drawdown since its inception was -40.52%, smaller than the maximum FENY drawdown of -74.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METW and FENY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METW | FENY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.52% | -74.35% | +33.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -69.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.63% | -6.35% | -21.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.31% | -23.12% | +5.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.99% | — |
Volatility
METW vs. FENY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METW | FENY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.57% | 20.39% | +22.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.57% | 26.46% | +16.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.57% | 29.80% | +12.77% |
METW vs. FENY - Expense Ratio Comparison
METW has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FENY's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
METW vs. FENY - Dividend Comparison
METW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.37%, more than FENY's 2.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 2.41% | 3.18% | 3.05% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.69% | 4.60% | 6.43% | 3.21% | 2.94% | 2.29% | 3.05% |
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF | 55.37% | 30.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METW and FENY have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FENY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FENY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for METW.
METW has the higher dividend yield at 55.37%, compared with 2.41% for FENY.
METW is categorized as Technology Equities, while FENY is Energy Equities. METW tracks Ball Metaverse Index, while FENY tracks MSCI USA IMI Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for METW and 0.08% for FENY.
Find the right allocation for METW and FENY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer