XNAS.L vs. LSMC.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE).
XNAS.L and LSMC.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XNAS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 21, 2021. LSMC.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. It was launched on Jul 3, 2020. Both XNAS.L and LSMC.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XNAS.L vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XNAS.L vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | -8.15% | 19.83% | 26.60% | 56.41% | -1.82% |
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 1.25% | 49.69% | 57.01% | 79.97% | 12.38% |
Different Trading Currencies
XNAS.L is traded in USD, while LSMC.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LSMC.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNAS.L achieves a -8.15% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 1.25% return.
XNAS.L
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -6.35%
- YTD
- -8.15%
- 6M
- -4.86%
- 1Y
- 23.10%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -9.22%
- YTD
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 12.79%
- 1Y
- 83.72%
- 3Y*
- 48.14%
- 5Y*
- 23.99%
- 10Y*
- 22.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XNAS.L vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNAS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XNAS.L vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XNAS.L
LSMC.DE
XNAS.L vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNAS.L | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 2.45 | -1.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 2.98 | -1.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.39 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 5.50 | -3.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.61 | 18.17 | -11.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNAS.L | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 2.45 | -1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.27 | 0.63 | +0.65 |
Correlation
The correlation between XNAS.L and LSMC.DE is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XNAS.L vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XNAS.L nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XNAS.L vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNAS.L drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, smaller than the maximum LSMC.DE drawdown of -47.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.L and LSMC.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNAS.L | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.92% | -39.77% | +16.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.62% | -15.54% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.47% | -11.63% | +1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.11% | -9.45% | +6.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 4.71% | -1.70% |
Volatility
XNAS.L vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) is 4.93%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 8.44%. This indicates that XNAS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XNAS.L | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 8.44% | -3.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.46% | 22.03% | -10.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.63% | 34.06% | -14.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 32.08% | -12.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 26.52% | -7.17% |