CBUT.DE vs. IITU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L).
CBUT.DE and IITU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CBUT.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NYSE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Capped. It was launched on Sep 27, 2022. IITU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. It was launched on Nov 20, 2015. Both CBUT.DE and IITU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CBUT.DE vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CBUT.DE vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUT.DE iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -11.70% | 13.17% | 12.43% | 235.40% | -36.41% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -7.23% | 8.47% | 47.65% | 53.89% | -6.28% |
Different Trading Currencies
CBUT.DE is traded in EUR, while IITU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IITU.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUT.DE achieves a -11.70% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's -7.23% return.
CBUT.DE
- 1D
- 4.43%
- 1M
- -7.45%
- YTD
- -11.70%
- 6M
- -29.38%
- 1Y
- 43.93%
- 3Y*
- 32.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IITU.L
- 1D
- 3.56%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- -7.23%
- 6M
- -5.40%
- 1Y
- 20.88%
- 3Y*
- 24.32%
- 5Y*
- 18.22%
- 10Y*
- 22.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CBUT.DE vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUT.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CBUT.DE vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
CBUT.DE
IITU.L
CBUT.DE vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBUT.DE | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | 0.85 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 1.28 | +0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.17 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 1.27 | -0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.87 | 3.46 | -1.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBUT.DE | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 0.85 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.95 | -0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUT.DE and IITU.L is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CBUT.DE vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBUT.DE nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CBUT.DE vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUT.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.95%, which is greater than IITU.L's maximum drawdown of -30.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUT.DE and IITU.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUT.DE | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.95% | -28.03% | -25.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.09% | -16.76% | -26.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.56% | -13.74% | -26.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.81% | -5.17% | -14.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.45% | 6.26% | +14.19% |
Volatility
CBUT.DE vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE) has a higher volatility of 14.67% compared to iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) at 5.84%. This indicates that CBUT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CBUT.DE | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.67% | 5.84% | +8.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.42% | 15.26% | +25.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.06% | 24.70% | +29.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.93% | 22.49% | +38.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.93% | 21.69% | +39.24% |