PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUT.DE vs. IBLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CBUT.DE vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CBUT.DE vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CBUT.DE
iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-11.70%13.17%12.43%235.40%-36.41%
IBLC
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
-9.43%11.97%26.41%192.43%-33.91%
Different Trading Currencies

CBUT.DE is traded in EUR, while IBLC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBLC values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUT.DE achieves a -11.70% return, which is significantly lower than IBLC's -9.43% return.


CBUT.DE

1D
4.43%
1M
-7.45%
YTD
-11.70%
6M
-29.38%
1Y
43.93%
3Y*
32.31%
5Y*
10Y*

IBLC

1D
-0.24%
1M
-8.04%
YTD
-9.43%
6M
-29.62%
1Y
40.26%
3Y*
32.03%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CBUT.DE vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBUT.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CBUT.DE vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUT.DE
CBUT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
CBUT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

IBLC
IBLC Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IBLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBLC Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
IBLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBLC Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUT.DE vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBUT.DEIBLCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

0.69

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.37

1.30

+0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.15

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

1.03

-0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.87

2.28

-0.41

CBUT.DE vs. IBLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the IBLC Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUT.DE and IBLC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBUT.DEIBLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

0.69

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.19

+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between CBUT.DE and IBLC is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CBUT.DE vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison

CBUT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%.


TTM2025202420232022
CBUT.DE
iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBLC
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
7.07%6.31%1.60%1.79%0.84%

Drawdowns

CBUT.DE vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUT.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.95%, smaller than the maximum IBLC drawdown of -62.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUT.DE and IBLC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUT.DEIBLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.95%

-62.54%

+8.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.09%

-44.94%

+1.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.56%

-41.36%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.81%

-26.02%

+6.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.45%

20.32%

+0.13%

Volatility

CBUT.DE vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE) is 14.67%, while iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) has a volatility of 17.49%. This indicates that CBUT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CBUT.DEIBLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.67%

17.49%

-2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.42%

43.91%

-3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.06%

59.05%

-4.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.93%

63.86%

-2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.93%

63.86%

-2.93%