PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METL vs. TURF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

METL vs. TURF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METL achieves a 18.34% return, which is significantly lower than TURF's 20.54% return.


METL

1D
-3.81%
1M
5.71%
YTD
18.34%
6M
25.03%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TURF

1D
1.60%
1M
0.70%
YTD
20.54%
6M
25.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METL vs. TURF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between METL and TURF is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

METL vs. TURF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

METL vs. TURF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


METLTURFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.72

2.60

-0.89

Drawdowns

METL vs. TURF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METL drawdown since its inception was -27.39%, which is greater than TURF's maximum drawdown of -6.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METL and TURF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METLTURFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.39%

-6.84%

-20.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.27%

-1.73%

-8.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.11%

-1.52%

-6.59%

Volatility

METL vs. TURF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METLTURFDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.94%

16.51%

+27.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.94%

16.51%

+27.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.94%

16.51%

+27.43%

METL vs. TURF - Expense Ratio Comparison

METL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than TURF's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

METL vs. TURF - Dividend Comparison

METL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than TURF's 1.24% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


METL and TURF have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TURF is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TURF is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.

TURF has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.84% for METL.

They also come from different issuers: Sprott and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for METL and 0.44% for TURF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for METL and TURF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer