METL vs. SPPP
METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) and SPPP (Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - METL is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Sprott, while SPPP is a Precious Metals fund actively managed by Sprott. Both are actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. METL charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for SPPP.
Performance
METL vs. SPPP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METL achieves a 18.34% return, which is significantly higher than SPPP's -14.37% return.
METL
- 1D
- -3.81%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 18.34%
- 6M
- 25.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPPP
- 1D
- -4.12%
- 1M
- -6.42%
- YTD
- -14.37%
- 6M
- -2.30%
- 1Y
- 39.19%
- 3Y*
- 5.59%
- 5Y*
- -6.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.53%
METL vs. SPPP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 18.34% | 27.04% |
SPPP Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust | -14.37% | 36.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between METL and SPPP is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METL vs. SPPP — Risk / Return Rank
METL
SPPP
METL vs. SPPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METL | SPPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.72 | 0.09 | +1.63 |
Drawdowns
METL vs. SPPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METL drawdown since its inception was -27.39%, smaller than the maximum SPPP drawdown of -59.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METL and SPPP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METL | SPPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.39% | -59.09% | +31.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -37.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -37.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -58.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.27% | -36.14% | +25.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.11% | -26.48% | +18.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 17.60% | — |
Volatility
METL vs. SPPP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METL | SPPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 45.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.94% | 50.97% | -7.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.94% | 34.89% | +9.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.94% | 33.10% | +10.84% |
METL vs. SPPP - Expense Ratio Comparison
METL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than SPPP's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
METL vs. SPPP - Dividend Comparison
METL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, while SPPP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 0.84% | 0.99% |
SPPP Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METL and SPPP have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, METL is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
METL is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for SPPP.
METL has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.00% for SPPP.
METL is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while SPPP is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for METL and 1.02% for SPPP.
Find the right allocation for METL and SPPP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer