METL vs. IYZ
METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) and IYZ (iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METL is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Sprott, while IYZ is a Communications Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index. METL is actively managed, while IYZ is passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. METL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IYZ.
Performance
METL vs. IYZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METL achieves a 7.51% return, which is significantly lower than IYZ's 26.58% return.
METL
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -9.97%
- YTD
- 7.51%
- 6M
- 15.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IYZ
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 26.58%
- 6M
- 29.19%
- 1Y
- 51.92%
- 3Y*
- 28.42%
- 5Y*
- 7.24%
- 10Y*
- 5.76%
METL vs. IYZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 7.51% | 27.04% |
IYZ iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF | 26.58% | 7.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between METL and IYZ is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METL vs. IYZ — Risk / Return Rank
METL
IYZ
METL vs. IYZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METL | IYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 0.07 | +1.11 |
Drawdowns
METL vs. IYZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METL drawdown since its inception was -27.39%, smaller than the maximum IYZ drawdown of -77.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METL and IYZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METL | IYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.39% | -77.11% | +49.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.48% | -6.96% | -11.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.24% | -40.13% | +31.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.99% | — |
Volatility
METL vs. IYZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METL | IYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.85% | 18.43% | +26.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.85% | 18.84% | +26.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.85% | 19.29% | +25.56% |
METL vs. IYZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
METL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than IYZ's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
METL vs. IYZ - Dividend Comparison
METL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than IYZ's 1.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYZ iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF | 1.57% | 2.04% | 1.94% | 2.27% | 2.55% | 2.51% | 2.60% | 2.36% | 2.15% | 3.54% | 2.27% | 1.98% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 0.92% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METL and IYZ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IYZ is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IYZ is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.
IYZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 0.92% for METL.
METL is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while IYZ is Communications Equities. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for METL and 0.42% for IYZ.
Find the right allocation for METL and IYZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer