METL vs. FENY
METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) and FENY (Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METL is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Sprott, while FENY is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Energy Index. METL is actively managed, while FENY is passively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. METL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FENY.
Performance
METL vs. FENY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METL achieves a 18.34% return, which is significantly lower than FENY's 32.28% return.
METL
- 1D
- -3.81%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 18.34%
- 6M
- 25.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FENY
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 32.28%
- 6M
- 29.37%
- 1Y
- 45.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.48%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
METL vs. FENY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 18.34% | 27.04% |
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 32.28% | 2.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between METL and FENY is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METL vs. FENY — Risk / Return Rank
METL
FENY
METL vs. FENY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METL | FENY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.72 | 0.20 | +1.52 |
Drawdowns
METL vs. FENY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METL drawdown since its inception was -27.39%, smaller than the maximum FENY drawdown of -74.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METL and FENY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METL | FENY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.39% | -74.35% | +46.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -69.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.27% | -6.35% | -3.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.11% | -23.12% | +15.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.99% | — |
Volatility
METL vs. FENY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METL | FENY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.94% | 20.39% | +23.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.94% | 26.46% | +17.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.94% | 29.80% | +14.14% |
METL vs. FENY - Expense Ratio Comparison
METL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FENY's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
METL vs. FENY - Dividend Comparison
METL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than FENY's 2.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 2.41% | 3.18% | 3.05% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.69% | 4.60% | 6.43% | 3.21% | 2.94% | 2.29% | 3.05% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 0.84% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METL and FENY have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FENY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FENY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.
FENY has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 0.84% for METL.
METL is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while FENY is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for METL and 0.08% for FENY.
Find the right allocation for METL and FENY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer