METL vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METL is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by Sprott, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. METL is actively managed, while BITI is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. METL charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

METL vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METL achieves a -3.21% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 28.75% return.

METL

• 1D: -2.92%
• 1M: -13.23%
• 6M: -14.80%
• YTD: -3.21%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BITI

• 1D: 2.65%
• 1M: 1.46%
• 6M: 34.68%
• YTD: 28.75%
• 1Y: 68.34%
• 3Y*: -30.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METL vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	-3.21%	28.19%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	28.75%	23.23%

Correlation

The correlation between METL and BITI is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025	-0.40

Return for Risk

METL vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 57
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 50
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METL vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	METL	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.56	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.13	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.26	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.72	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.78	—

Drawdowns

METL vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METL drawdown since its inception was -27.39%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METL and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	METL	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.39%	-92.16%	+64.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-25.28%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-84.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.61%	-85.94%	+59.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.59%	-68.34%	+58.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.11%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	METL	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.38%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	34.25%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.31%	44.14%	+0.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.31%	52.28%	-7.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.31%	52.28%	-7.97%

METL vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

METL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

METL vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

METL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than BITI's 15.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.10%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	1.03%	0.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METL and BITI in my portfolio?

METL and BITI have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, METL or BITI?

On fees, METL is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, METL or BITI?

METL is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METL or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.10%, compared with 1.03% for METL.

What is the main difference between METL and BITI?

METL is categorized as Natural Resources, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for METL and 1.03% for BITI.