PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METL vs. ABX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

METL vs. ABX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

METL vs. ABX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
METL
Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF
6.41%27.04%
ABX.TO
Barrick Gold Corporation
-5.34%48.21%
Different Trading Currencies

METL is traded in USD, while ABX.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ABX.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METL achieves a 6.41% return, which is significantly higher than ABX.TO's -5.34% return.


METL

1D
6.47%
1M
-16.66%
YTD
6.41%
6M
23.35%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ABX.TO

1D
6.37%
1M
-19.39%
YTD
-5.34%
6M
26.11%
1Y
115.55%
3Y*
33.21%
5Y*
18.36%
10Y*
13.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

METL vs. ABX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METL

ABX.TO
ABX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ABX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ABX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METL vs. ABX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

METL vs. ABX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


METLABX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.62

0.09

+1.54

Correlation

The correlation between METL and ABX.TO is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

METL vs. ABX.TO - Dividend Comparison

METL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than ABX.TO's 2.05% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
METL
Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF
0.93%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ABX.TO
Barrick Gold Corporation
2.05%1.23%2.45%2.27%3.64%4.06%1.42%0.92%1.36%1.02%0.59%1.93%

Drawdowns

METL vs. ABX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METL drawdown since its inception was -27.39%, smaller than the maximum ABX.TO drawdown of -88.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METL and ABX.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


METLABX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.39%

-84.49%

+57.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.32%

-20.22%

+0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.76%

-31.46%

+24.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.89%

Volatility

METL vs. ABX.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


METLABX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.92%

44.82%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.92%

35.78%

+9.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.92%

37.86%

+7.06%