PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METI.L vs. JEPG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

METI.L vs. JEPG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP (METI.L) and JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JEPG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

METI.L is traded in GBp, while JEPG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JEPG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METI.L achieves a -27.60% return, which is significantly lower than JEPG.L's 0.51% return.


METI.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-9.59%
YTD
-27.60%
6M
-26.84%
1Y
-33.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JEPG.L

1D
0.86%
1M
1.63%
YTD
0.51%
6M
1.25%
1Y
6.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METI.L vs. JEPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
METI.L
IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP
-27.60%-0.90%3.56%
JEPG.L
JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (dist)
0.51%4.41%1.00%

Correlation

The correlation between METI.L and JEPG.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2024

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

METI.L vs. JEPG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METI.L
METI.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
METI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
METI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
METI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
METI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

JEPG.L
JEPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
JEPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
JEPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METI.L vs. JEPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP (METI.L) and JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JEPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


METI.LJEPG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.12

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

0.77

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.95

1.95

-2.90

METI.L vs. JEPG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METI.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the JEPG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METI.L and JEPG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

METI.L vs. JEPG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METI.L drawdown since its inception was -52.73%, which is greater than JEPG.L's maximum drawdown of -8.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METI.L and JEPG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METI.LJEPG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.73%

-8.78%

-43.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.73%

-8.78%

-43.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.73%

-4.91%

-47.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.63%

-2.86%

-19.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.71%

3.48%

+31.23%

Volatility

METI.L vs. JEPG.L - Volatility Comparison

IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP (METI.L) has a higher volatility of 10.42% compared to JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JEPG.L) at 3.62%. This indicates that METI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METI.LJEPG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.42%

3.62%

+6.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.77%

7.74%

+17.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.42%

10.24%

+41.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.17%

11.40%

+32.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.17%

11.40%

+32.77%

METI.L vs. JEPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

METI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

METI.L vs. JEPG.L - Dividend Comparison

METI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.32%, more than JEPG.L's 8.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
JEPG.L
JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (dist)
8.26%7.86%6.50%
METI.L
IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP
21.32%20.59%3.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


METI.L and JEPG.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JEPG.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JEPG.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for METI.L.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for METI.L and 0.35% for JEPG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for METI.L and JEPG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer