PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METI.L vs. AVGI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

METI.L vs. AVGI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP (METI.L) and IncomeShares Broadcom (AVGO) Options ETP (AVGI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

METI.L is traded in GBp, while AVGI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AVGI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METI.L achieves a -27.60% return, which is significantly lower than AVGI.L's 10.70% return.


METI.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-9.59%
YTD
-27.60%
6M
-26.84%
1Y
-33.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVGI.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-6.98%
YTD
10.70%
6M
11.64%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METI.L vs. AVGI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
METI.L
IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP
-27.60%-4.14%
AVGI.L
IncomeShares Broadcom (AVGO) Options ETP
10.70%11,550.77%

Correlation

The correlation between METI.L and AVGI.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

METI.L vs. AVGI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METI.L
METI.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
METI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
METI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
METI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
METI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGI.L

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METI.L vs. AVGI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP (METI.L) and IncomeShares Broadcom (AVGO) Options ETP (AVGI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


METI.LAVGI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.95

METI.L vs. AVGI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

METI.L vs. AVGI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METI.L drawdown since its inception was -52.73%, which is greater than AVGI.L's maximum drawdown of -44.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METI.L and AVGI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METI.LAVGI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.73%

-44.48%

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.73%

-28.51%

-24.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.63%

-22.61%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.71%

Volatility

METI.L vs. AVGI.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METI.LAVGI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.42%

10,045.71%

-9,994.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.17%

10,045.71%

-10,001.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.17%

10,045.71%

-10,001.54%

METI.L vs. AVGI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both METI.L and AVGI.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


Dividends

METI.L vs. AVGI.L - Dividend Comparison

METI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.32%, less than AVGI.L's 49.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AVGI.L
IncomeShares Broadcom (AVGO) Options ETP
49.03%10.33%0.00%
METI.L
IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP
21.32%20.59%3.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


METI.L and AVGI.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

METI.L and AVGI.L have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for METI.L and AVGI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer