PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METD vs. TSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

METD vs. TSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) and Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X ETF (TSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METD achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly lower than TSMX's 48.80% return.


METD

1D
-3.30%
1M
3.04%
6M
20.93%
YTD
10.02%
1Y
24.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-11.68%

TSMX

1D
0.30%
1M
-15.56%
6M
28.30%
YTD
48.80%
1Y
129.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
87.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.85M$12.45M$7.88M
$51.36M$73.43M$83.39M

METD vs. TSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
METD
Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF
10.02%-17.33%-2.14%
TSMX
Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X ETF
48.80%81.48%16.84%

Correlation

The correlation between METD and TSMX is -0.30, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024

-0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

METD vs. TSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

METD
METD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
METD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
METD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
METD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
METD Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

TSMX
TSMX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

METD vs. TSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) and Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X ETF (TSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


METDTSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.25

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

2.93

-1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.50

8.89

-6.40

METD vs. TSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METD Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the TSMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METD and TSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

METD vs. TSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METD drawdown since its inception was -46.03%, smaller than the maximum TSMX drawdown of -63.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METD and TSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METDTSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.03%

-63.80%

+17.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.03%

-39.94%

+13.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.29%

-30.40%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.87%

-15.95%

-12.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.39%

13.13%

-1.74%

Volatility

METD vs. TSMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) is 15.23%, while Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X ETF (TSMX) has a volatility of 27.37%. This indicates that METD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METDTSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.23%

27.37%

-12.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.46%

66.13%

-35.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.18%

81.69%

-41.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.75%

84.12%

-46.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.75%

84.12%

-46.37%

METD vs. TSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

METD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

METD vs. TSMX - Dividend Comparison

METD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than TSMX's 5.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
METD
Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF
2.51%3.35%2.30%
TSMX
Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X ETF
5.70%8.01%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


METD and TSMX have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSMX has higher volatility (27.37%) compared to METD (15.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METD dropped -46.03% vs TSMX's -63.80%.

On 1-year performance, TSMX leads with 129.25% vs 24.41% for METD. On fees, TSMX is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, METD has been the lower-risk option at 15.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMX has performed better with a 129.25% return vs 24.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSMX is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for METD.

TSMX has the higher dividend yield at 5.70%, compared with 2.51% for METD.

METD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TSMX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for METD and 0.99% for TSMX.

TSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for METD and TSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer