METD vs. SPXS
METD (Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF) and SPXS (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds from Direxion. METD is actively managed, while SPXS is passively managed. Over the past year, METD returned 1.14% vs -48.73% for SPXS. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. METD charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for SPXS.
Performance
METD vs. SPXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METD achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly higher than SPXS's -25.49% return.
METD
- 1D
- -4.20%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- -1.28%
- 1Y
- 1.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXS
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- -13.11%
- YTD
- -25.49%
- 6M
- -24.86%
- 1Y
- -48.73%
- 3Y*
- -42.68%
- 5Y*
- -34.76%
- 10Y*
- -42.01%
METD vs. SPXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF | 1.66% | -17.33% | -15.84% |
SPXS Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares | -25.49% | -41.53% | -22.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between METD and SPXS is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024 | 0.57 |
The correlation between METD and SPXS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METD vs. SPXS — Risk / Return Rank
METD
SPXS
METD vs. SPXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METD | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.03 | -1.38 | +1.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.29 | -2.31 | +2.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.75 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.05 | -0.96 | +1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.11 | -1.62 | +1.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METD | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 | -1.38 | +1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | -0.83 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
METD vs. SPXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METD drawdown since its inception was -46.03%, smaller than the maximum SPXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METD and SPXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METD | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.03% | -100.00% | +53.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.38% | -50.77% | +26.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -84.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -90.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.66% | -100.00% | +65.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.61% | -96.30% | +67.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.35% | 30.04% | -18.69% |
Volatility
METD vs. SPXS - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS) have volatilities of 8.85% and 8.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METD | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.85% | 8.51% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.02% | 26.82% | +0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.57% | 35.54% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.41% | 50.39% | -13.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.41% | 53.54% | -17.13% |
METD vs. SPXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
METD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXS's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
METD vs. SPXS - Dividend Comparison
METD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than SPXS's 4.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF | 2.69% | 3.35% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXS Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares | 4.91% | 4.93% | 6.18% | 5.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 1.74% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METD and SPXS have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
METD has higher volatility (8.85%) compared to SPXS (8.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METD dropped -46.03% vs SPXS's -100.00%.
On 1-year performance, METD leads with 1.14% vs -48.73% for SPXS. On fees, METD is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, SPXS has been the lower-risk option at 8.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, METD has performed better with a 1.14% return vs -48.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
METD is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SPXS.
SPXS has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 2.69% for METD.
Their fees differ too: 1.00% for METD and 1.08% for SPXS.
METD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for METD and SPXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer