METD vs. SOXL
METD (Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF) and SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while SOXL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the ICE Semiconductor Index. METD is actively managed, while SOXL is passively managed. Over the past year, METD returned 1.14% vs 1438.30% for SOXL. At a correlation of -0.43, they often move in opposite directions. METD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SOXL.
Performance
METD vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METD achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 567.48% return.
METD
- 1D
- -4.20%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- -1.28%
- 1Y
- 1.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXL
- 1D
- 5.34%
- 1M
- 119.95%
- YTD
- 567.48%
- 6M
- 502.28%
- 1Y
- 1,438.30%
- 3Y*
- 135.13%
- 5Y*
- 48.72%
- 10Y*
- 65.39%
METD vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF | 1.66% | -17.33% | -15.84% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 567.48% | 54.91% | -48.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between METD and SOXL is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024 | -0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METD vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank
METD
SOXL
METD vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METD | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -14.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.72 | -0.68 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.05 | 33.47 | -33.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.11 | 114.79 | -114.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METD | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 | 14.28 | -14.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | 0.52 | -0.96 |
Drawdowns
METD vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METD drawdown since its inception was -46.03%, smaller than the maximum SOXL drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METD and SOXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METD | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.03% | -90.46% | +44.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.38% | -43.47% | +19.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -87.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -90.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.66% | 0.00% | -34.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.61% | -35.01% | +6.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.35% | 12.65% | -1.30% |
Volatility
METD vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) is 8.85%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 40.82%. This indicates that METD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METD | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.85% | 40.82% | -31.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.02% | 81.29% | -54.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.57% | 102.11% | -66.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.41% | 107.25% | -70.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.41% | 99.04% | -62.63% |
METD vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
METD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
METD vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison
METD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than SOXL's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF | 2.69% | 3.35% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.03% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METD and SOXL have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXL has higher volatility (40.82%) compared to METD (8.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METD dropped -46.03% vs SOXL's -90.46%.
On 1-year performance, SOXL leads with 1438.30% vs 1.14% for METD. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, METD has been the lower-risk option at 8.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 1438.30% return vs 1.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for METD.
METD has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.03% for SOXL.
METD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SOXL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for METD and 0.75% for SOXL.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.28 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for METD and SOXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer