METD vs. NVDU

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

METD (Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF) and NVDU (Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while NVDU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, METD returned -0.27% vs 8.20% for NVDU. At a correlation of -0.45, they often move in opposite directions. METD charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for NVDU.

Performance

METD vs. NVDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METD achieves a -4.51% return, which is significantly lower than NVDU's 3.46% return.

METD

• 1D: 2.81%
• 1M: -13.81%
• 6M: -10.28%
• YTD: -4.51%
• 1Y: -0.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDU

• 1D: -4.61%
• 1M: -4.14%
• 6M: 4.31%
• YTD: 3.46%
• 1Y: 8.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METD vs. NVDU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	-4.51%	-17.33%	-15.84%
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF	3.46%	33.65%	6.34%

Correlation

The correlation between METD and NVDU is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024	-0.45

Return for Risk

METD vs. NVDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METD

METD Risk / Return Rank: 10
METD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
METD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
METD Omega Ratio Rank: 12
METD Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
METD Martin Ratio Rank: 10

NVDU

NVDU Risk / Return Rank: 13
NVDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
NVDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
NVDU Omega Ratio Rank: 15
NVDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
NVDU Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METD vs. NVDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	METD	NVDU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.01	0.12	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.26	0.68	-0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.08	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.01	0.19	-0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.02	0.39	-0.42

METD vs. NVDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METD Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the NVDU Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METD and NVDU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

METD vs. NVDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METD drawdown since its inception was -46.03%, smaller than the maximum NVDU drawdown of -67.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METD and NVDU.

Drawdown Indicators

	METD	NVDU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.03%	-67.27%	+21.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.03%	-42.27%	+16.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.63%	-29.53%	-9.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.78%	-19.17%	-9.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.64%	20.82%	-9.18%

Volatility

METD vs. NVDU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) is 16.67%, while Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) has a volatility of 22.26%. This indicates that METD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METD	NVDU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.67%	22.26%	-5.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.76%	55.16%	-23.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.08%	71.25%	-32.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.47%	90.65%	-53.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.47%	90.65%	-53.18%

METD vs. NVDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

METD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDU's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

METD vs. NVDU - Dividend Comparison

METD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than NVDU's 5.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	2.89%	3.35%	2.30%	0.00%
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF	5.71%	5.68%	16.85%	0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METD and NVDU in my portfolio?

METD and NVDU have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, METD or NVDU?

NVDU has higher volatility (22.26%) compared to METD (16.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METD dropped -46.03% vs NVDU's -67.27%.

Which ETF is better, METD or NVDU?

On 1-year performance, NVDU leads with 8.20% vs -0.27% for METD. On fees, METD is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, METD has been the lower-risk option at 16.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, METD or NVDU?

Over the 1-year period, NVDU has performed better with a 8.20% return vs -0.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, METD or NVDU?

METD is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for NVDU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METD or NVDU?

NVDU has the higher dividend yield at 5.71%, compared with 2.89% for METD.

What is the main difference between METD and NVDU?

METD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while NVDU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for METD and 1.04% for NVDU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.