METD vs. NFXS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

METD (Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF) and NFXS (Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds from Direxion. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, METD returned 16.44% vs 64.26% for NFXS. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. METD charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for NFXS.

Performance

METD vs. NFXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METD achieves a 11.74% return, which is significantly lower than NFXS's 24.21% return.

METD

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 7.29%
• YTD: 11.74%
• 6M: 12.81%
• 1Y: 16.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NFXS

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 21.28%
• YTD: 24.21%
• 6M: 24.00%
• 1Y: 64.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METD vs. NFXS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	11.74%	-17.33%	-2.14%
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares	24.21%	-8.56%	-21.49%

Correlation

The correlation between METD and NFXS is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024	0.33

The correlation between METD and NFXS shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

METD vs. NFXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METD

METD Risk / Return Rank: 17
METD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
METD Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
METD Omega Ratio Rank: 18
METD Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
METD Martin Ratio Rank: 16

NFXS

NFXS Risk / Return Rank: 55
NFXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
NFXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
NFXS Omega Ratio Rank: 68
NFXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
NFXS Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METD vs. NFXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	METD	NFXS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	1.91	-1.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.86	2.55	-1.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.36	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.68	2.06	-1.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.54	5.64	-4.09

METD vs. NFXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METD Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the NFXS Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METD and NFXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

METD vs. NFXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METD drawdown since its inception was -46.03%, smaller than the maximum NFXS drawdown of -50.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METD and NFXS.

Drawdown Indicators

	METD	NFXS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.03%	-50.37%	+4.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.38%	-31.31%	+6.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.18%	-12.88%	-15.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.60%	-31.93%	+3.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.70%	11.45%	-0.75%

Volatility

METD vs. NFXS - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) has a higher volatility of 13.02% compared to Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) at 7.74%. This indicates that METD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METD	NFXS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.02%	7.74%	+5.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.31%	26.22%	+2.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.59%	33.81%	+2.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.64%	34.65%	+1.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.64%	34.65%	+1.99%

METD vs. NFXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

METD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than NFXS's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

METD vs. NFXS - Dividend Comparison

METD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, less than NFXS's 3.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	3.02%	3.35%	2.30%
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares	3.23%	3.53%	0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METD and NFXS in my portfolio?

METD and NFXS have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, METD or NFXS?

METD has higher volatility (13.02%) compared to NFXS (7.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METD dropped -46.03% vs NFXS's -50.37%.

Which ETF is better, METD or NFXS?

On 1-year performance, NFXS leads with 64.26% vs 16.44% for METD. On fees, METD is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, NFXS has been the lower-risk option at 7.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, METD or NFXS?

Over the 1-year period, NFXS has performed better with a 64.26% return vs 16.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, METD or NFXS?

METD is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for NFXS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METD or NFXS?

NFXS has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 3.02% for METD.

What is the main difference between METD and NFXS?

Their fees differ too: 1.00% for METD and 1.03% for NFXS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NFXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.