METD vs. MYY
METD (Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF) and MYY (ProShares Short S&P Mid Cap400) are both Inverse Equities funds. METD is actively managed, while MYY is passively managed. Over the past year, METD returned 0.55% vs -13.14% for MYY. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. METD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for MYY.
Performance
METD vs. MYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METD achieves a -5.91% return, which is significantly higher than MYY's -11.03% return.
METD
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -15.71%
- 6M
- -8.51%
- YTD
- -5.91%
- 1Y
- 0.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MYY
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- 6M
- -6.84%
- YTD
- -11.03%
- 1Y
- -13.14%
- 3Y*
- -8.04%
- 5Y*
- -6.30%
- 10Y*
- -10.79%
METD vs. MYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF | -5.91% | -17.33% | -15.84% |
MYY ProShares Short S&P Mid Cap400 | -11.03% | -4.05% | -4.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between METD and MYY is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METD vs. MYY — Risk / Return Rank
METD
MYY
METD vs. MYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) and ProShares Short S&P Mid Cap400 (MYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| METD | MYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.87 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.02 | -0.72 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.05 | -1.36 | +1.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
METD vs. MYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METD drawdown since its inception was -46.03%, smaller than the maximum MYY drawdown of -95.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METD and MYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METD | MYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.03% | -95.20% | +49.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.68% | -18.25% | -6.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -71.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.53% | -95.07% | +55.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.69% | -72.25% | +43.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.24% | 9.65% | +1.59% |
Volatility
METD vs. MYY - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) has a higher volatility of 16.53% compared to ProShares Short S&P Mid Cap400 (MYY) at 4.22%. This indicates that METD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METD | MYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.53% | 4.22% | +12.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.61% | 11.69% | +19.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.91% | 15.83% | +23.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.47% | 19.60% | +17.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.47% | 21.21% | +16.26% |
METD vs. MYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
METD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than MYY's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
METD vs. MYY - Dividend Comparison
METD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than MYY's 4.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF | 2.94% | 3.35% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MYY ProShares Short S&P Mid Cap400 | 4.29% | 4.20% | 4.92% | 5.08% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 1.52% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METD and MYY have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
METD has higher volatility (16.53%) compared to MYY (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METD dropped -46.03% vs MYY's -95.20%.
On 1-year performance, METD leads with 0.55% vs -13.14% for MYY. On fees, MYY is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MYY has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, METD has performed better with a 0.55% return vs -13.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MYY is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for METD.
MYY has the higher dividend yield at 4.29%, compared with 2.94% for METD.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for METD and 0.95% for MYY.
METD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.01 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for METD and MYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer