METD vs. LCDS

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

METD (Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF) and LCDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while LCDS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, METD returned -2.77% vs 21.60% for LCDS. At a correlation of -0.59, they often move in opposite directions. METD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LCDS.

Performance

METD vs. LCDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF (LCDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METD achieves a -7.12% return, which is significantly lower than LCDS's 10.61% return.

METD

• 1D: 2.39%
• 1M: -11.46%
• 6M: -12.68%
• YTD: -7.12%
• 1Y: -2.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LCDS

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 0.63%
• 6M: 9.41%
• YTD: 10.61%
• 1Y: 21.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METD vs. LCDS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	-7.12%	-17.33%	-16.11%
LCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF	10.61%	17.66%	10.32%

Correlation

The correlation between METD and LCDS is -0.58, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2024	-0.59

The correlation between METD and LCDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.59 to -0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

METD vs. LCDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METD

METD Risk / Return Rank: 9
METD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
METD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
METD Omega Ratio Rank: 10
METD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
METD Martin Ratio Rank: 8

LCDS

LCDS Risk / Return Rank: 66
LCDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
LCDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
LCDS Omega Ratio Rank: 66
LCDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
LCDS Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METD vs. LCDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF (LCDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	METD	LCDS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.07	1.78	-1.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.17	2.44	-2.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.32	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.11	2.40	-2.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.24	10.26	-10.50

METD vs. LCDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METD Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the LCDS Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METD and LCDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

METD vs. LCDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METD drawdown since its inception was -46.03%, which is greater than LCDS's maximum drawdown of -18.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METD and LCDS.

Drawdown Indicators

	METD	LCDS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.03%	-18.39%	-27.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.03%	-9.03%	-17.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.30%	-0.49%	-39.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.76%	-2.15%	-26.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.56%	2.11%	+9.45%

Volatility

METD vs. LCDS - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) has a higher volatility of 16.33% compared to JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF (LCDS) at 3.06%. This indicates that METD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METD	LCDS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.33%	3.06%	+13.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.74%	9.66%	+22.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.00%	12.21%	+26.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.46%	16.09%	+21.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.46%	16.09%	+21.37%

METD vs. LCDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

METD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than LCDS's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

METD vs. LCDS - Dividend Comparison

METD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than LCDS's 0.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
LCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF	0.86%	0.92%	0.48%
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	2.97%	3.35%	2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METD and LCDS in my portfolio?

METD and LCDS have a correlation of -0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, METD or LCDS?

METD has higher volatility (16.33%) compared to LCDS (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METD dropped -46.03% vs LCDS's -18.39%.

Which ETF is better, METD or LCDS?

On 1-year performance, LCDS leads with 21.60% vs -2.77% for METD. On fees, LCDS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, LCDS has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, METD or LCDS?

Over the 1-year period, LCDS has performed better with a 21.60% return vs -2.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, METD or LCDS?

LCDS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for METD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METD or LCDS?

METD has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 0.86% for LCDS.

What is the main difference between METD and LCDS?

METD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while LCDS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for METD and 0.30% for LCDS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LCDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.