METD vs. GLBL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

METD (Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF) and GLBL (Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while GLBL is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Ricardo Comparative Advantage Select Index. METD is actively managed, while GLBL is passively managed. Over the past year, METD returned 24.41% vs 22.93% for GLBL. Their -0.60 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. METD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for GLBL.

Performance

METD vs. GLBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) and Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF (GLBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with METD having a 10.02% return and GLBL slightly higher at 10.24%.

METD

• 1D: -3.30%
• 1M: 3.04%
• 6M: 20.93%
• YTD: 10.02%
• 1Y: 24.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -11.68%

GLBL

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 0.42%
• 6M: 9.42%
• YTD: 10.24%
• 1Y: 22.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GLBL Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF	$1.43K	$927.62	$2.16K
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	$10.85M	$12.45M	$7.88M

METD vs. GLBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	10.02%	-17.33%	-8.59%
GLBL Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF	10.24%	20.14%	5.49%

Correlation

The correlation between METD and GLBL is -0.58, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2024	-0.60

The correlation between METD and GLBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.60 to -0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

METD vs. GLBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

METD

METD Risk / Return Rank: 32
METD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
METD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
METD Omega Ratio Rank: 35
METD Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
METD Martin Ratio Rank: 29

GLBL

GLBL Risk / Return Rank: 56
GLBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
GLBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
GLBL Omega Ratio Rank: 56
GLBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
GLBL Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

METD vs. GLBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) and Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF (GLBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	METD	GLBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	1.42	-0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.24	1.96	-0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.25	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	1.90	-0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.50	6.89	-4.40

METD vs. GLBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METD Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the GLBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METD and GLBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

METD vs. GLBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METD drawdown since its inception was -46.03%, which is greater than GLBL's maximum drawdown of -19.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METD and GLBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	METD	GLBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.03%	-19.75%	-26.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.03%	-10.97%	-15.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.29%	-3.15%	-26.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.87%	-2.64%	-26.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.39%	3.02%	+8.37%

Volatility

METD vs. GLBL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) has a higher volatility of 15.23% compared to Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF (GLBL) at 3.49%. This indicates that METD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METD	GLBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.23%	3.49%	+11.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.46%	11.70%	+18.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.18%	14.67%	+25.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.75%	16.53%	+21.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.75%	16.53%	+21.22%

METD vs. GLBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

METD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GLBL's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

METD vs. GLBL - Dividend Comparison

METD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than GLBL's 0.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GLBL Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF	0.78%	0.86%	0.15%
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	2.51%	3.35%	2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METD and GLBL in my portfolio?

METD and GLBL have a correlation of -0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, METD or GLBL?

METD has higher volatility (15.23%) compared to GLBL (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METD dropped -46.03% vs GLBL's -19.75%.

Which ETF is better, METD or GLBL?

On 1-year performance, METD leads with 24.41% vs 22.93% for GLBL. On fees, GLBL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, GLBL has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, METD or GLBL?

Over the 1-year period, METD has performed better with a 24.41% return vs 22.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, METD or GLBL?

GLBL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for METD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METD or GLBL?

METD has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 0.78% for GLBL.

What is the main difference between METD and GLBL?

METD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while GLBL is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for METD and 0.65% for GLBL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.