PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METD vs. FIAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

METD vs. FIAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) and YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METD achieves a 6.12% return, which is significantly lower than FIAT's 9.13% return.


METD

1D
0.54%
1M
1.84%
YTD
6.12%
6M
4.24%
1Y
6.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FIAT

1D
3.52%
1M
6.41%
YTD
9.13%
6M
22.96%
1Y
-7.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METD vs. FIAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
METD
Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF
6.12%-17.33%-9.06%
FIAT
YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
9.13%-24.17%-28.61%

Correlation

The correlation between METD and FIAT is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

METD vs. FIAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METD
METD Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
METD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
METD Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
METD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
METD Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

FIAT
FIAT Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
FIAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIAT Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FIAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIAT Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METD vs. FIAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) and YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


METDFIATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.18

-0.14

+0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.49

0.17

+0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.02

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.09

-0.18

+0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.20

-0.28

+0.48

METD vs. FIAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METD Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is higher than the FIAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METD and FIAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


METDFIATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

-0.14

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.39

-0.40

+0.01

Drawdowns

METD vs. FIAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METD drawdown since its inception was -46.03%, smaller than the maximum FIAT drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METD and FIAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METDFIATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.03%

-70.50%

+24.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.38%

-42.26%

+17.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.79%

-52.97%

+21.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.60%

-45.34%

+16.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.30%

27.30%

-16.00%

Volatility

METD vs. FIAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) is 7.69%, while YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT) has a volatility of 16.00%. This indicates that METD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METDFIATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.69%

16.00%

-8.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.69%

42.07%

-15.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.52%

55.32%

-19.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.33%

60.54%

-24.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.33%

60.54%

-24.21%

METD vs. FIAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

METD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FIAT's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

METD vs. FIAT - Dividend Comparison

METD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than FIAT's 97.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FIAT
YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
97.31%178.11%70.99%
METD
Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF
2.57%3.35%2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


METD and FIAT have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIAT has higher volatility (16.00%) compared to METD (7.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METD dropped -46.03% vs FIAT's -70.50%.

On 1-year performance, METD leads with 6.23% vs -7.95% for FIAT. On fees, FIAT is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, METD has been the lower-risk option at 7.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, METD has performed better with a 6.23% return vs -7.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FIAT is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for METD.

FIAT has the higher dividend yield at 97.31%, compared with 2.57% for METD.

METD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while FIAT is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for METD and 0.99% for FIAT.

METD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for METD and FIAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer