META vs. WPM.TO
META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) and WPM.TO (Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.) are both stocks. META operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while WPM.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, META returned 17.39%/yr vs 20.54%/yr for WPM.TO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
META vs. WPM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
META is traded in USD, while WPM.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the WPM.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, META achieves a -14.03% return, which is significantly lower than WPM.TO's -1.10% return. Over the past 10 years, META has underperformed WPM.TO with an annualized return of 17.39%, while WPM.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.54% annualized return.
META
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- YTD
- -14.03%
- 6M
- -11.84%
- 1Y
- -16.71%
- 3Y*
- 28.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
WPM.TO
- 1D
- 3.11%
- 1M
- -10.99%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 6M
- -0.75%
- 1Y
- 27.62%
- 3Y*
- 38.75%
- 5Y*
- 20.54%
- 10Y*
- 20.54%
META vs. WPM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -14.03% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 33.09% | 56.57% | -25.71% | 53.38% |
WPM.TO Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. | -1.10% | 110.53% | 15.36% | 28.25% | -6.96% | 3.25% | 42.44% | 53.50% | -9.83% | 16.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between META and WPM.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012 | 0.09 |
Fundamentals
META:
$1.45T
WPM.TO:
CA$73.85B
META:
$27.47
WPM.TO:
$3.96
META:
20.64
WPM.TO:
29.36
META:
0.85
WPM.TO:
0.79
META:
6.78
WPM.TO:
19.24
META:
5.97
WPM.TO:
5.71
META:
$214.96B
WPM.TO:
$2.74B
META:
$176.14B
WPM.TO:
$2.12B
META:
$106.31B
WPM.TO:
$2.37B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
META vs. WPM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
META
WPM.TO
META vs. WPM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| META | WPM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.15 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 0.86 | -1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | 2.46 | -3.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
META vs. WPM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, smaller than the maximum WPM.TO drawdown of -86.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and WPM.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| META | WPM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -86.62% | +9.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.30% | -34.97% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.15% | -34.97% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.74% | -42.43% | -34.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.74% | -48.37% | -28.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.06% | -29.72% | +1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.83% | -31.38% | +15.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.06% | 12.17% | +3.89% |
Volatility
META vs. WPM.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) is 10.17%, while Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM.TO) has a volatility of 17.83%. This indicates that META experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WPM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| META | WPM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.17% | 17.83% | -7.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.91% | 38.50% | -11.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.52% | 45.47% | -9.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.04% | 34.10% | +9.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.67% | 35.73% | +2.94% |
Dividends
META vs. WPM.TO - Dividend Comparison
META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than WPM.TO's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WPM.TO Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. | 0.62% | 0.57% | 1.05% | 1.25% | 1.40% | 1.05% | 1.08% | 1.24% | 1.75% | 1.54% | 1.06% | 1.48% |
Financials
META vs. WPM.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Meta Platforms, Inc. and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
META vs. WPM.TO - Profitability Comparison
META - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.
WPM.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a gross profit of 687.49M and revenue of 886.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.5%.
META - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.
WPM.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported an operating income of 665.21M and revenue of 886.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 75.0%.
META - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.
WPM.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a net income of 572.50M and revenue of 886.69M, resulting in a net margin of 64.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
META and WPM.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for META and WPM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer