PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WPM.TO vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WPM.TO vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM.TO) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WPM.TO is traded in CAD, while GLDM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLDM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WPM.TO achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's -1.49% return.


WPM.TO

1D
-4.09%
1M
-5.21%
YTD
2.81%
6M
-1.36%
1Y
34.37%
3Y*
44.65%
5Y*
26.38%
10Y*
21.09%

GLDM

1D
-2.02%
1M
-6.29%
YTD
-1.49%
6M
-5.89%
1Y
25.37%
3Y*
32.01%
5Y*
21.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WPM.TO vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WPM.TO
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
2.81%100.91%25.13%25.20%-1.07%3.20%39.06%47.18%-5.42%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
-1.49%56.71%37.84%10.35%5.84%-4.06%22.13%13.23%4.23%

Correlation

The correlation between WPM.TO and GLDM is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018

0.61

The correlation between WPM.TO and GLDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WPM.TO vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WPM.TO
WPM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
WPM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
WPM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WPM.TO vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM.TO) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WPM.TOGLDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.19

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

1.15

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.75

3.08

-0.34

WPM.TO vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WPM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WPM.TO and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WPM.TO vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WPM.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.21%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -22.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPM.TO and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WPM.TOGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.21%

-22.76%

-60.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.62%

-22.09%

-11.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.62%

-22.09%

-11.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.04%

-22.09%

-16.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.80%

-20.39%

-6.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.74%

-7.18%

-18.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.54%

8.26%

+4.28%

Volatility

WPM.TO vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.85% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 8.25%. This indicates that WPM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WPM.TOGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.85%

8.25%

+10.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.47%

24.15%

+15.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.33%

27.34%

+18.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.80%

19.07%

+14.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.39%

18.14%

+17.25%

Dividends

WPM.TO vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

WPM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WPM.TO
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
0.61%0.57%1.05%1.25%1.40%1.05%1.08%1.24%1.75%1.54%1.06%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


WPM.TO and GLDM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WPM.TO and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer