META vs. USO
META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock, while USO (United States Oil Fund LP) is Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Over the past 10 years, META returned 18.15%/yr vs 4.07%/yr for USO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
META vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, META achieves a -5.54% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 103.67% return. Over the past 10 years, META has outperformed USO with an annualized return of 18.15%, while USO has yielded a comparatively lower 4.07% annualized return.
META
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- -5.54%
- 6M
- -2.44%
- 1Y
- -6.29%
- 3Y*
- 32.06%
- 5Y*
- 13.70%
- 10Y*
- 18.15%
USO
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- -4.57%
- YTD
- 103.67%
- 6M
- 99.35%
- 1Y
- 101.55%
- 3Y*
- 29.98%
- 5Y*
- 24.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.07%
META vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -5.54% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 33.09% | 56.57% | -25.71% | 53.38% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 103.67% | -8.46% | 13.35% | -4.94% | 28.97% | 64.68% | -67.79% | 32.61% | -19.57% | 2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between META and USO is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012 | 0.08 |
The correlation between META and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.09 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
META vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
META
USO
META vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| META | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.38 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 5.01 | -5.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | 9.42 | -9.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| META | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 | 2.31 | -2.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.68 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.10 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | -0.18 | +0.73 |
Drawdowns
META vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| META | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -98.19% | +21.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.30% | -20.39% | -12.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.15% | -26.05% | -8.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.74% | -36.23% | -40.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.74% | -86.75% | +10.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.96% | -85.01% | +64.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.25% | -75.30% | +60.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.47% | 10.82% | +4.65% |
Volatility
META vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) is 8.84%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 14.87%. This indicates that META experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| META | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.84% | 14.87% | -6.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.58% | 38.23% | -11.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.23% | 44.20% | -8.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.99% | 36.06% | +7.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.64% | 39.00% | -0.36% |
Dividends
META vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.34% | 0.32% | 0.34% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
META and USO have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USO has higher volatility (14.87%) compared to META (8.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, META dropped -76.74% vs USO's -98.19%.
USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for META and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer