META vs. T
META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) and T (AT&T Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Communication Services sector — META in Internet Content & Information, T in Telecom Services. Over the past 10 years, META returned 17.39%/yr vs 3.33%/yr for T. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
META vs. T - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, META achieves a -14.03% return, which is significantly lower than T's -2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, META has outperformed T with an annualized return of 17.39%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 3.33% annualized return.
META
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- YTD
- -14.03%
- 6M
- -11.84%
- 1Y
- -16.71%
- 3Y*
- 28.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
T
- 1D
- 2.52%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- -2.96%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- -12.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- 3.33%
META vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -14.03% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 33.09% | 56.57% | -25.71% | 53.38% |
T AT&T Inc. | -2.96% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between META and T is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012 | 0.12 |
The correlation between META and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
META:
$27.47
T:
$3.04
META:
20.64
T:
7.74
META:
0.85
T:
0.32
META:
6.78
T:
1.35
META:
$214.96B
T:
$125.65B
META:
$176.14B
T:
$105.41B
META:
$106.31B
T:
$54.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
META vs. T — Risk / Return Rank
META
T
META vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| META | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.92 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | -0.59 | +0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | -1.22 | +0.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
META vs. T - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and T.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| META | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -64.15% | -12.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.30% | -21.87% | -11.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.15% | -21.87% | -12.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.74% | -32.01% | -44.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.74% | -42.35% | -34.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.06% | -18.12% | -9.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.83% | -15.72% | -0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.06% | 10.64% | +5.42% |
Volatility
META vs. T - Volatility Comparison
Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a higher volatility of 10.17% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 8.21%. This indicates that META's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| META | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.17% | 8.21% | +1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.91% | 17.80% | +9.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.52% | 22.13% | +13.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.04% | 24.01% | +20.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.67% | 23.73% | +14.94% |
Dividends
META vs. T - Dividend Comparison
META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than T's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
T AT&T Inc. | 4.71% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
META vs. T - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Meta Platforms, Inc. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
META and T have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
META has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to T (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, META dropped -76.74% vs T's -64.15%.
META currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for META and T
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer