META vs. SCHD
META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock, while SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Over the past 10 years, META returned 18.83%/yr vs 12.49%/yr for SCHD. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
META vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, META achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 22.44% return. Over the past 10 years, META has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 18.83%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.49% annualized return.
META
- 1D
- -2.46%
- 1M
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- -5.15%
- 3Y*
- 29.23%
- 5Y*
- 14.46%
- 10Y*
- 18.83%
SCHD
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- 6M
- 15.69%
- YTD
- 22.44%
- 1Y
- 27.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.45%
- 10Y*
- 12.49%
META vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.85% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 33.09% | 56.57% | -25.71% | 53.38% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 22.44% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between META and SCHD is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012 | 0.33 |
The correlation between META and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
META vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
META
SCHD
META vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| META | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.44 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 5.92 | -6.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.29 | 14.46 | -14.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
META vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| META | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -33.37% | -43.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.30% | -4.61% | -28.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.15% | -16.13% | -18.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.74% | -16.85% | -59.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.74% | -33.37% | -43.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.61% | 0.00% | -15.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.88% | -3.30% | -12.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.56% | 1.89% | +15.67% |
Volatility
META vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a higher volatility of 15.85% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 4.10%. This indicates that META's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| META | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.85% | 4.10% | +11.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.06% | 8.05% | +23.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.61% | 11.04% | +27.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.58% | 14.40% | +30.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.98% | 16.71% | +22.27% |
Dividends
META vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than SCHD's 3.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.32% | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.17% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
META and SCHD have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
META has higher volatility (15.85%) compared to SCHD (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, META dropped -76.74% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for META and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer