META vs. NEM
META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) and NEM (Newmont Corporation) are both stocks. META operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while NEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, META returned 17.35%/yr vs 11.22%/yr for NEM. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
META vs. NEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, META achieves a -9.67% return, which is significantly lower than NEM's -6.26% return. Over the past 10 years, META has outperformed NEM with an annualized return of 17.35%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.22% annualized return.
META
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- 6.73%
- 6M
- -9.49%
- YTD
- -9.67%
- 1Y
- -16.46%
- 3Y*
- 26.81%
- 5Y*
- 10.18%
- 10Y*
- 17.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.62%
NEM
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- 6M
- -24.71%
- YTD
- -6.26%
- 1Y
- 53.11%
- 3Y*
- 31.67%
- 5Y*
- 12.38%
- 10Y*
- 11.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.82%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.75B | $11.93B | $11.10B | |
| $751.28M | $741.04M | $822.38M |
META vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -9.67% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 33.09% | 56.57% | -25.71% | 53.38% |
NEM Newmont Corporation | -6.26% | 172.82% | -7.83% | -8.76% | -20.77% | 7.40% | 40.28% | 30.52% | -6.15% | 10.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between META and NEM is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012 | 0.09 |
Fundamentals
META:
$1.51T
NEM:
$99.49B
META:
$27.47
NEM:
$7.88
META:
21.67
NEM:
11.82
META:
0.89
NEM:
0.31
META:
7.12
NEM:
5.31
META:
6.26
NEM:
2.81
META:
$214.96B
NEM:
$19.13B
META:
$176.14B
NEM:
$10.94B
META:
$106.31B
NEM:
$14.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
META vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank
META
NEM
META vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| META | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.21 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 1.66 | -2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | 3.81 | -4.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
META vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, smaller than the maximum NEM drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and NEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| META | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -81.30% | +4.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.30% | -32.10% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.15% | -36.57% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.74% | -62.40% | -14.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.74% | -62.40% | -14.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.41% | -29.07% | +4.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.88% | -41.33% | +25.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.84% | 14.00% | +3.84% |
Volatility
META vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison
Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a higher volatility of 15.60% compared to Newmont Corporation (NEM) at 10.40%. This indicates that META's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| META | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.60% | 10.40% | +5.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.79% | 37.49% | -6.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.91% | 47.79% | -8.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.56% | 38.27% | +6.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.01% | 35.73% | +3.28% |
Dividends
META vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison
META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than NEM's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.35% | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NEM Newmont Corporation | 1.09% | 1.00% | 2.69% | 3.87% | 4.66% | 3.55% | 1.74% | 3.31% | 1.62% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% |
Financials
META vs. NEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Meta Platforms, Inc. and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
META and NEM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
META has higher volatility (15.60%) compared to NEM (10.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, META dropped -76.74% vs NEM's -81.30%.
NEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for META and NEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer