META vs. MINT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock, while MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Over the past 10 years, META returned 17.39%/yr vs 2.72%/yr for MINT. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

META vs. MINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, META achieves a -14.03% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, META has outperformed MINT with an annualized return of 17.39%, while MINT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.72% annualized return.

META

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -7.69%
• YTD: -14.03%
• 6M: -11.84%
• 1Y: -16.71%
• 3Y*: 28.18%
• 5Y*: 11.52%
• 10Y*: 17.39%

MINT

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 1.94%
• 6M: 2.19%
• 1Y: 4.67%
• 3Y*: 5.40%
• 5Y*: 3.49%
• 10Y*: 2.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

META vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	-14.03%	13.09%	66.05%	194.13%	-64.22%	23.13%	33.09%	56.57%	-25.71%	53.38%
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	1.94%	4.74%	5.94%	6.26%	-1.01%	-0.03%	1.62%	3.34%	1.72%	1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between META and MINT is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012	0.00

The correlation between META and MINT shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.09 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

META vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

META

META Risk / Return Rank: 21
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
META Omega Ratio Rank: 20
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
META Martin Ratio Rank: 18

MINT

MINT Risk / Return Rank: 100
MINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

META vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	META	MINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	17.51	-18.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.54	66.94	-67.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	21.62	-20.69
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.54	95.35	-95.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.12	965.15	-966.27

META vs. MINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current META Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the MINT Sharpe Ratio of 17.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of META and MINT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

META vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and MINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	META	MINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.74%	-4.62%	-72.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.30%	-0.05%	-33.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.15%	-0.16%	-33.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-76.74%	-2.42%	-74.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-76.74%	-4.62%	-72.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.06%	0.00%	-28.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.83%	-0.17%	-15.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.06%	0.00%	+16.06%

Volatility

META vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison

Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a higher volatility of 10.17% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.09%. This indicates that META's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	META	MINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.17%	0.09%	+10.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.91%	0.20%	+26.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.52%	0.27%	+35.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.04%	0.58%	+43.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.67%	0.95%	+37.72%

Dividends

META vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison

META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than MINT's 4.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	0.37%	0.32%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	4.28%	4.63%	5.22%	4.91%	1.90%	0.44%	1.15%	2.65%	2.32%	1.61%	1.35%	0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both META and MINT in my portfolio?

META and MINT have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, META or MINT?

META has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to MINT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, META dropped -76.74% vs MINT's -4.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.51 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.