META vs. MAGS
META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock, while MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, META returned 27.49%/yr vs 31.06%/yr for MAGS. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
META vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, META achieves a -12.40% return, which is significantly lower than MAGS's -0.79% return.
META
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- YTD
- -12.40%
- 6M
- -12.22%
- 1Y
- -15.13%
- 3Y*
- 27.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.05%
- 10Y*
- 17.78%
MAGS
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -5.84%
- YTD
- -0.79%
- 6M
- -1.07%
- 1Y
- 25.62%
- 3Y*
- 31.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
META vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -12.40% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 64.82% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | -0.79% | 22.99% | 63.97% | 35.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between META and MAGS is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023 | 0.72 |
The correlation between META and MAGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
META vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
META
MAGS
META vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| META | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.21 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 1.31 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 4.36 | -5.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
META vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| META | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -29.91% | -46.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.30% | -18.62% | -14.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.15% | -29.91% | -4.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.69% | -7.75% | -18.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.84% | -4.73% | -11.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.38% | 5.58% | +10.80% |
Volatility
META vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a higher volatility of 12.77% compared to Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) at 7.03%. This indicates that META's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| META | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.77% | 7.03% | +5.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.88% | 15.57% | +12.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.16% | 20.60% | +15.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.16% | 26.01% | +18.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.74% | 26.01% | +12.73% |
Dividends
META vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than MAGS's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.49% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.36% | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
META and MAGS have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
META has higher volatility (12.77%) compared to MAGS (7.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, META dropped -76.74% vs MAGS's -29.91%.
MAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for META and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer