META vs. INTU

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) and INTU (Intuit Inc.) are both stocks. META operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while INTU operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 10 years, META returned 17.60%/yr vs 11.98%/yr for INTU. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

META vs. INTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and Intuit Inc. (INTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, META achieves a -11.24% return, which is significantly higher than INTU's -53.65% return. Over the past 10 years, META has outperformed INTU with an annualized return of 17.60%, while INTU has yielded a comparatively lower 11.98% annualized return.

META

• 1D: -1.28%
• 1M: -3.98%
• YTD: -11.24%
• 6M: -12.06%
• 1Y: -15.84%
• 3Y*: 30.58%
• 5Y*: 12.31%
• 10Y*: 17.60%

INTU

• 1D: 2.95%
• 1M: -22.91%
• YTD: -53.65%
• 6M: -53.22%
• 1Y: -60.08%
• 3Y*: -10.25%
• 5Y*: -7.58%
• 10Y*: 11.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

META vs. INTU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	-11.24%	13.09%	66.05%	194.13%	-64.22%	23.13%	33.09%	56.57%	-25.71%	53.38%
INTU Intuit Inc.	-53.65%	6.09%	1.16%	61.76%	-39.12%	70.27%	46.12%	34.11%	25.86%	39.21%

Correlation

The correlation between META and INTU is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012	0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between META and INTU has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap META : $1.50T INTU : $84.32B
EPS META : $27.47 INTU : $16.37
PE Ratio META : 21.31 INTU : 18.66
PEG Ratio META : 0.88 INTU : 1.12
PS Ratio META : 7.00 INTU : 4.09
PB Ratio META : 6.16 INTU : 4.09
Total Revenue (TTM) META : $214.96B INTU : $20.93B
Gross Profit (TTM) META : $176.14B INTU : $16.97B
EBITDA (TTM) META : $106.31B INTU : $6.65B

Return for Risk

META vs. INTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

META

META Risk / Return Rank: 23
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
META Omega Ratio Rank: 22
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
META Martin Ratio Rank: 22

INTU

INTU Risk / Return Rank: 2
INTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
INTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
INTU Omega Ratio Rank: 2
INTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
INTU Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

META vs. INTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and Intuit Inc. (INTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	META	INTU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.45	-1.37	+0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.44	-2.20	+1.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	0.71	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.48	-0.96	+0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.01	-1.83	+0.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

META vs. INTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current META Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is higher than the INTU Sharpe Ratio of -1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of META and INTU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	META	INTU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.45	-1.37	+0.92
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	-0.20	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.35	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.35	+0.19

Drawdowns

META vs. INTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, roughly equal to the maximum INTU drawdown of -75.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and INTU.

Drawdown Indicators

	META	INTU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.74%	-75.29%	-1.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.30%	-63.00%	+29.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.15%	-63.00%	+28.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-76.74%	-63.00%	-13.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-76.74%	-63.00%	-13.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.73%	-61.90%	+36.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.26%	-24.12%	+8.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.69%	32.93%	-17.24%

Volatility

META vs. INTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) is 10.48%, while Intuit Inc. (INTU) has a volatility of 28.43%. This indicates that META experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	META	INTU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.48%	28.43%	-17.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.95%	42.39%	-15.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.56%	44.21%	-8.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.05%	37.47%	+6.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.69%	33.95%	+4.74%

Dividends

META vs. INTU - Dividend Comparison

META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than INTU's 1.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INTU Intuit Inc.	1.52%	0.65%	0.60%	0.52%	0.72%	0.38%	0.57%	0.74%	0.83%	0.89%	1.08%	1.09%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	0.36%	0.32%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

META vs. INTU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Meta Platforms, Inc. and Intuit Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.

INTU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuit Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.24B and revenue of 8.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.

INTU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuit Inc. reported an operating income of 4.02B and revenue of 8.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 47.0%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.

INTU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuit Inc. reported a net income of 3.06B and revenue of 8.56B, resulting in a net margin of 35.8%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both META and INTU in my portfolio?

META and INTU have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, META or INTU?

INTU has higher volatility (28.43%) compared to META (10.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, META dropped -76.74% vs INTU's -75.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

META currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.45 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.