META vs. CONL
META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock, while CONL (GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Over the past 3 years, META returned 27.49%/yr vs -8.64%/yr for CONL. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
META vs. CONL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, META achieves a -12.40% return, which is significantly higher than CONL's -63.14% return.
META
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- -4.51%
- YTD
- -12.40%
- 6M
- -12.22%
- 1Y
- -16.77%
- 3Y*
- 27.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.05%
- 10Y*
- 17.78%
CONL
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -30.59%
- YTD
- -63.14%
- 6M
- -68.88%
- 1Y
- -83.91%
- 3Y*
- -8.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
META vs. CONL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -12.40% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -29.32% |
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF | -63.14% | -58.49% | 4.23% | 641.63% | -80.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between META and CONL is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
META vs. CONL — Risk / Return Rank
META
CONL
META vs. CONL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| META | CONL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.89 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | -0.91 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | -1.23 | +0.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
META vs. CONL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, smaller than the maximum CONL drawdown of -94.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and CONL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| META | CONL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -94.36% | +17.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.30% | -92.57% | +59.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.15% | -94.36% | +60.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.69% | -93.66% | +66.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.84% | -56.37% | +40.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.38% | 68.46% | -52.08% |
Volatility
META vs. CONL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) is 12.77%, while GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) has a volatility of 36.22%. This indicates that META experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CONL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| META | CONL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.77% | 36.22% | -23.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.88% | 102.76% | -74.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.16% | 139.79% | -103.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.16% | 149.68% | -105.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.74% | 149.68% | -110.94% |
Dividends
META vs. CONL - Dividend Comparison
META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while CONL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.31% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.36% | 0.32% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
META and CONL have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CONL has higher volatility (36.22%) compared to META (12.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, META dropped -76.74% vs CONL's -94.36%.
META currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for META and CONL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer