META vs. AGI.TO
META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) and AGI.TO (Alamos Gold Inc.) are both stocks. META operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while AGI.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, META returned 17.39%/yr vs 17.19%/yr for AGI.TO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
META vs. AGI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
META is traded in USD, while AGI.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the AGI.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, META achieves a -14.03% return, which is significantly lower than AGI.TO's -8.85% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with META having a 17.39% annualized return and AGI.TO not far behind at 17.19%.
META
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -8.32%
- YTD
- -14.03%
- 6M
- -11.84%
- 1Y
- -16.71%
- 3Y*
- 28.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
AGI.TO
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- -18.99%
- YTD
- -8.85%
- 6M
- -8.29%
- 1Y
- 28.36%
- 3Y*
- 42.62%
- 5Y*
- 32.82%
- 10Y*
- 17.19%
META vs. AGI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -14.03% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 33.09% | 56.57% | -25.71% | 53.38% |
AGI.TO Alamos Gold Inc. | -8.85% | 110.12% | 38.03% | 34.44% | 33.88% | -11.57% | 46.88% | 67.22% | -44.53% | -4.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between META and AGI.TO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
META:
$1.45T
AGI.TO:
CA$20.75B
META:
$27.47
AGI.TO:
$2.52
META:
20.64
AGI.TO:
13.99
META:
0.85
AGI.TO:
0.09
META:
6.78
AGI.TO:
7.19
META:
5.97
AGI.TO:
3.22
META:
$214.96B
AGI.TO:
$2.07B
META:
$176.14B
AGI.TO:
$1.22B
META:
$106.31B
AGI.TO:
$1.43B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
META vs. AGI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
META
AGI.TO
META vs. AGI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| META | AGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.14 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 0.72 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | 2.06 | -3.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
META vs. AGI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, smaller than the maximum AGI.TO drawdown of -88.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and AGI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| META | AGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -88.23% | +11.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.30% | -40.44% | +7.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.15% | -40.44% | +6.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.74% | -40.44% | -36.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.74% | -71.24% | -5.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.06% | -36.26% | +8.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.83% | -40.82% | +24.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.06% | 14.06% | +2.00% |
Volatility
META vs. AGI.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) is 10.17%, while Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI.TO) has a volatility of 17.53%. This indicates that META experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| META | AGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.17% | 17.53% | -7.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.91% | 41.70% | -14.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.52% | 50.53% | -15.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.04% | 39.75% | +4.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.67% | 47.07% | -8.40% |
Dividends
META vs. AGI.TO - Dividend Comparison
META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, which matches AGI.TO's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGI.TO Alamos Gold Inc. | 0.37% | 0.26% | 0.52% | 0.76% | 0.91% | 1.03% | 0.79% | 0.51% | 0.41% | 0.29% | 0.22% | 0.88% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
META vs. AGI.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Meta Platforms, Inc. and Alamos Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
META vs. AGI.TO - Profitability Comparison
META - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.
AGI.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 375.05M and revenue of 586.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.9%.
META - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.
AGI.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 336.79M and revenue of 586.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.4%.
META - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.
AGI.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a net income of 188.26M and revenue of 586.92M, resulting in a net margin of 32.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
META and AGI.TO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for META and AGI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer