META vs. ^GSPC
META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, META returned 17.39%/yr vs 13.61%/yr for ^GSPC. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
META vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, META achieves a -14.03% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 8.56% return. Over the past 10 years, META has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 17.39%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 13.61% annualized return.
META
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -8.05%
- YTD
- -14.03%
- 6M
- -11.84%
- 1Y
- -17.97%
- 3Y*
- 28.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
^GSPC
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 8.85%
- 1Y
- 22.93%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.61%
META vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -14.03% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 33.09% | 56.57% | -25.71% | 53.38% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 8.56% | 16.39% | 23.31% | 24.23% | -19.44% | 26.89% | 16.26% | 28.88% | -6.24% | 19.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between META and ^GSPC is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012 | 0.56 |
The correlation between META and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
META vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
META
^GSPC
META vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| META | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.34 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 2.53 | -3.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | 11.37 | -12.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
META vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| META | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -56.78% | -19.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.30% | -9.10% | -24.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.15% | -18.90% | -15.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.74% | -25.43% | -51.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.74% | -33.92% | -42.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.06% | -2.34% | -25.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.83% | -10.72% | -5.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.06% | 2.02% | +14.04% |
Volatility
META vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a higher volatility of 10.17% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.43%. This indicates that META's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| META | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.17% | 4.43% | +5.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.91% | 9.70% | +17.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.52% | 12.38% | +23.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.04% | 16.97% | +27.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.67% | 18.09% | +20.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
META and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
META has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to ^GSPC (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, META dropped -76.74% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.
^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for META and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer