PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
META.L vs. GGRG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

META.L vs. GGRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced (META.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

META.L is traded in USD, while GGRG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GGRG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, META.L achieves a 10.73% return, which is significantly higher than GGRG.L's 5.03% return.


META.L

1D
-0.30%
1M
3.62%
YTD
10.73%
6M
17.26%
1Y
30.93%
3Y*
11.40%
5Y*
10Y*

GGRG.L

1D
0.27%
1M
3.70%
YTD
5.03%
6M
6.50%
1Y
16.52%
3Y*
13.34%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

META.L vs. GGRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
META.L
WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced
10.73%16.98%3.79%-8.15%16.29%
GGRG.L
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc
5.03%16.53%9.25%17.43%7.29%

Correlation

The correlation between META.L and GGRG.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

META.L vs. GGRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

META.L
META.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
META.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
META.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
META.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
META.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

GGRG.L
GGRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GGRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GGRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

META.L vs. GGRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced (META.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


META.LGGRG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.25

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

1.58

+1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.10

6.32

+5.78

META.L vs. GGRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current META.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the GGRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of META.L and GGRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


META.LGGRG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.37

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.79

-0.23

Drawdowns

META.L vs. GGRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum META.L drawdown since its inception was -20.21%, smaller than the maximum GGRG.L drawdown of -30.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META.L and GGRG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


META.LGGRG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.21%

-30.46%

+10.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-10.40%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.21%

-15.21%

-5.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

0.00%

-1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.94%

-4.29%

-5.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

2.61%

-0.06%

Volatility

META.L vs. GGRG.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced (META.L) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that META.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


META.LGGRG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

2.62%

+1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.91%

9.09%

+3.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.22%

12.05%

+3.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.54%

14.32%

+3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.54%

14.76%

+2.78%

META.L vs. GGRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

META.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GGRG.L's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

META.L vs. GGRG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither META.L nor GGRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


META.L and GGRG.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GGRG.L is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GGRG.L is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for META.L.

META.L is categorized as Metals, while GGRG.L is Global Equities. META.L tracks Optimised Roll Industrial Metals, while GGRG.L tracks WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for META.L and 0.38% for GGRG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for META.L and GGRG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer