PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MENYX vs. MMDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MENYX vs. MMDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Covered Call & Equity Income Fund (MENYX) and Madison Moderate Allocation Fund (MMDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MENYX achieves a 5.89% return, which is significantly lower than MMDAX's 8.81% return. Over the past 10 years, MENYX has outperformed MMDAX with an annualized return of 8.15%, while MMDAX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.40% annualized return.


MENYX

1D
-0.52%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
5.89%
6M
5.72%
1Y
13.92%
3Y*
6.86%
5Y*
6.20%
10Y*
8.15%

MMDAX

1D
0.33%
1M
4.09%
YTD
8.81%
6M
9.30%
1Y
17.63%
3Y*
11.10%
5Y*
4.53%
10Y*
6.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MENYX vs. MMDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MENYX
Madison Covered Call & Equity Income Fund
5.89%6.69%2.79%10.66%5.06%18.71%12.65%15.76%-6.01%7.57%
MMDAX
Madison Moderate Allocation Fund
8.81%11.13%6.97%10.32%-14.49%6.79%9.77%15.99%-4.80%14.29%

Correlation

The correlation between MENYX and MMDAX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2009

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between MENYX and MMDAX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MENYX vs. MMDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MENYX
MENYX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MENYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MENYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MENYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MENYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
MENYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

MMDAX
MMDAX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MMDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MMDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MENYX vs. MMDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Covered Call & Equity Income Fund (MENYX) and Madison Moderate Allocation Fund (MMDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MENYXMMDAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.39

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

2.57

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.57

10.93

-0.35

MENYX vs. MMDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MENYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the MMDAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MENYX and MMDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MENYXMMDAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

2.13

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.42

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.60

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.43

+0.17

Drawdowns

MENYX vs. MMDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MENYX drawdown since its inception was -28.38%, smaller than the maximum MMDAX drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MENYX and MMDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MENYXMMDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.38%

-43.12%

+14.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.07%

-7.05%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.14%

-10.02%

-6.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.14%

-25.36%

+9.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.38%

-25.36%

-3.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

0.00%

-2.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.50%

-7.37%

+4.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

1.66%

-0.22%

Volatility

MENYX vs. MMDAX - Volatility Comparison

Madison Covered Call & Equity Income Fund (MENYX) and Madison Moderate Allocation Fund (MMDAX) have volatilities of 2.73% and 2.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MENYXMMDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

2.87%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.85%

7.02%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.27%

8.51%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.43%

10.75%

+0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.46%

10.70%

+2.76%

MENYX vs. MMDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MENYX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than MMDAX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

MENYX vs. MMDAX - Dividend Comparison

MENYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.17%, more than MMDAX's 5.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MENYX
Madison Covered Call & Equity Income Fund
8.17%8.52%7.83%7.71%6.98%6.48%6.34%7.07%9.82%7.64%6.74%7.48%
MMDAX
Madison Moderate Allocation Fund
5.63%6.12%3.70%2.15%1.39%8.46%9.24%3.95%9.05%5.13%4.36%7.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MENYX and MMDAX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMDAX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to MENYX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MENYX dropped -28.38% vs MMDAX's -43.12%.

MMDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MENYX and MMDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer