PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEMX vs. GOOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEMX vs. GOOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEMX achieves a 29.81% return, which is significantly higher than GOOY's 13.92% return.


MEMX

1D
0.55%
1M
5.01%
YTD
29.81%
6M
38.48%
1Y
63.43%
3Y*
24.90%
5Y*
10Y*

GOOY

1D
0.00%
1M
-7.48%
YTD
13.92%
6M
14.56%
1Y
81.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEMX vs. GOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MEMX
Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF
29.81%35.88%5.50%2.99%
GOOY
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF
13.92%53.95%12.58%-3.35%

Correlation

The correlation between MEMX and GOOY is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2023

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEMX vs. GOOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEMX
MEMX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
MEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOY
GOOY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEMX vs. GOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MEMXGOOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.60

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.16

5.06

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.97

18.64

-2.67

MEMX vs. GOOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the GOOY Sharpe Ratio of 3.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEMX and GOOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MEMX vs. GOOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEMX drawdown since its inception was -19.27%, smaller than the maximum GOOY drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEMX and GOOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEMXGOOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.27%

-24.40%

+5.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.70%

-16.15%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

-8.37%

+4.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-6.27%

+2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

4.38%

-0.55%

Volatility

MEMX vs. GOOY - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX) has a higher volatility of 11.94% compared to YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) at 6.21%. This indicates that MEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEMXGOOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.94%

6.21%

+5.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.24%

17.39%

+3.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.42%

23.33%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.73%

23.29%

-5.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.73%

23.29%

-5.56%

MEMX vs. GOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEMX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEMX vs. GOOY - Dividend Comparison

MEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than GOOY's 49.78% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GOOY
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF
49.78%41.50%36.74%7.90%
MEMX
Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF
3.76%4.88%0.99%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEMX and GOOY have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MEMX has higher volatility (11.94%) compared to GOOY (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEMX dropped -19.27% vs GOOY's -24.40%.

On 1-year performance, GOOY leads with 81.48% vs 63.43% for MEMX. On fees, MEMX is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, GOOY has been the lower-risk option at 6.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOY has performed better with a 81.48% return vs 63.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MEMX is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOY.

GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 49.78%, compared with 3.76% for MEMX.

MEMX is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while GOOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Matthews and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MEMX and 0.99% for GOOY.

GOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEMX and GOOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer