MEMX vs. EMSF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MEMX (Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF) and EMSF (Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds from Matthews. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MEMX returned 70.49% vs 63.33% for EMSF. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

MEMX vs. EMSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX) and Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEMX achieves a 33.07% return, which is significantly lower than EMSF's 45.34% return.

MEMX

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 10.92%
• YTD: 33.07%
• 6M: 42.31%
• 1Y: 70.49%
• 3Y*: 26.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMSF

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: 8.61%
• YTD: 45.34%
• 6M: 40.08%
• 1Y: 63.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEMX vs. EMSF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MEMX Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF	33.07%	35.88%	5.50%	9.21%
EMSF Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF	45.34%	19.20%	-3.09%	1.88%

Correlation

The correlation between MEMX and EMSF is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2023	0.79

The correlation between MEMX and EMSF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

MEMX vs. EMSF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MEMX	EMSF
Technology	39.5%	43.6%
Financial Services	25.1%	16.6%
Industrials	9.6%	15.0%
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	7.7%
Healthcare	4.5%	6.8%
Communication Services	3.4%	2.0%
Energy	2.8%	-
Basic Materials	2.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	3.9%
Real Estate	1.5%	1.6%
Utilities	1.1%	2.8%

Return for Risk

MEMX vs. EMSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEMX

MEMX Risk / Return Rank: 89
MEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
MEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
MEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
MEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
MEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

EMSF

EMSF Risk / Return Rank: 76
EMSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
EMSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
EMSF Omega Ratio Rank: 72
EMSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
EMSF Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEMX vs. EMSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX) and Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MEMX	EMSF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.29	2.51	+0.78
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.11	3.14	+0.97
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.43	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.82	4.37	+0.45
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.20	14.61	+4.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MEMX vs. EMSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.29, which is higher than the EMSF Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEMX and EMSF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MEMX	EMSF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.29	2.51	+0.78
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.45	0.98	+0.47

Drawdowns

MEMX vs. EMSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEMX drawdown since its inception was -19.27%, smaller than the maximum EMSF drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEMX and EMSF.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEMX	EMSF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.27%	-24.75%	+5.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.70%	-14.57%	-0.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	-1.10%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.49%	-5.72%	+2.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.68%	4.35%	-0.67%

Volatility

MEMX vs. EMSF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX) is 9.43%, while Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF) has a volatility of 9.96%. This indicates that MEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MEMX	EMSF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.43%	9.96%	-0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.04%	21.98%	-2.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.53%	25.35%	-3.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.09%	22.75%	-5.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.09%	22.75%	-5.66%

MEMX vs. EMSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MEMX and EMSF have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

MEMX vs. EMSF - Dividend Comparison

MEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than EMSF's 1.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EMSF Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF	1.30%	1.88%	3.29%	0.02%
MEMX Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF	3.67%	4.88%	0.99%	1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MEMX and EMSF in my portfolio?

MEMX and EMSF have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MEMX or EMSF?

EMSF has higher volatility (9.96%) compared to MEMX (9.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEMX dropped -19.27% vs EMSF's -24.75%.

Which ETF is better, MEMX or EMSF?

On 1-year performance, MEMX leads with 70.49% vs 63.33% for EMSF. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, MEMX has been the lower-risk option at 9.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MEMX or EMSF?

Over the 1-year period, MEMX has performed better with a 70.49% return vs 63.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MEMX or EMSF?

MEMX and EMSF have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MEMX or EMSF?

MEMX has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 1.30% for EMSF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.