MEMQX vs. FPADX
MEMQX (Mercer Emerging Markets Equity Fund) and FPADX (Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 5 years, MEMQX returned 4.70%/yr vs 7.64%/yr for FPADX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MEMQX charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for FPADX.
Performance
MEMQX vs. FPADX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MEMQX achieves a 27.01% return, which is significantly lower than FPADX's 28.80% return.
MEMQX
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 7.12%
- YTD
- 27.01%
- 6M
- 29.37%
- 1Y
- 50.31%
- 3Y*
- 20.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.70%
- 10Y*
- —
FPADX
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 8.03%
- YTD
- 28.80%
- 6M
- 31.68%
- 1Y
- 55.65%
- 3Y*
- 24.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.31%
MEMQX vs. FPADX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEMQX Mercer Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 27.01% | 31.07% | 2.00% | 7.16% | -24.30% | 0.23% | 13.55% | 7.56% |
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund | 28.80% | 33.90% | 6.80% | 9.51% | -20.06% | -3.07% | 17.84% | 8.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between MEMQX and FPADX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2019 | 0.85 |
The correlation between MEMQX and FPADX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MEMQX vs. FPADX — Risk / Return Rank
MEMQX
FPADX
MEMQX vs. FPADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mercer Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEMQX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MEMQX | FPADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.60 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.85 | 4.34 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.71 | 17.23 | +0.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MEMQX | FPADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.64 | 3.24 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.45 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.37 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
MEMQX vs. FPADX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEMQX drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, roughly equal to the maximum FPADX drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEMQX and FPADX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEMQX | FPADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.09% | -39.16% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.37% | -13.28% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.89% | -16.09% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.37% | -37.00% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -0.96% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.11% | -13.26% | -3.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.19% | 3.34% | -0.15% |
Volatility
MEMQX vs. FPADX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mercer Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEMQX) is 6.11%, while Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that MEMQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MEMQX | FPADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 7.71% | -1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.68% | 15.44% | -1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.50% | 17.83% | -1.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.17% | 17.11% | +1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.62% | 17.82% | +1.80% |
MEMQX vs. FPADX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MEMQX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FPADX's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
MEMQX vs. FPADX - Dividend Comparison
MEMQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than FPADX's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund | 1.83% | 2.35% | 2.70% | 2.68% | 2.47% | 2.14% | 1.50% | 2.59% | 2.20% | 0.12% | 1.69% | 2.47% |
MEMQX Mercer Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 2.27% | 2.88% | 1.64% | 2.35% | 2.57% | 13.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMQX and FPADX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FPADX has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to MEMQX (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEMQX dropped -40.09% vs FPADX's -39.16%.
MEMQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.64 vs 3.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MEMQX and FPADX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer