PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEMQX vs. FPADX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEMQX vs. FPADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mercer Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEMQX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEMQX achieves a 27.01% return, which is significantly lower than FPADX's 28.80% return.


MEMQX

1D
-0.81%
1M
7.12%
YTD
27.01%
6M
29.37%
1Y
50.31%
3Y*
20.27%
5Y*
4.70%
10Y*

FPADX

1D
-0.96%
1M
8.03%
YTD
28.80%
6M
31.68%
1Y
55.65%
3Y*
24.57%
5Y*
7.64%
10Y*
10.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEMQX vs. FPADX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MEMQX
Mercer Emerging Markets Equity Fund
27.01%31.07%2.00%7.16%-24.30%0.23%13.55%7.56%
FPADX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund
28.80%33.90%6.80%9.51%-20.06%-3.07%17.84%8.60%

Correlation

The correlation between MEMQX and FPADX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2019

0.85

The correlation between MEMQX and FPADX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEMQX vs. FPADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEMQX
MEMQX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
MEMQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEMQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEMQX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
MEMQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEMQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FPADX
FPADX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FPADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPADX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FPADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPADX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEMQX vs. FPADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mercer Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEMQX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEMQXFPADXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.60

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.85

4.34

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.71

17.23

+0.48

MEMQX vs. FPADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEMQX Sharpe Ratio is 3.64, which is comparable to the FPADX Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEMQX and FPADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEMQXFPADXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.64

3.24

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.45

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.37

+0.04

Drawdowns

MEMQX vs. FPADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEMQX drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, roughly equal to the maximum FPADX drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEMQX and FPADX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEMQXFPADXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.09%

-39.16%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.37%

-13.28%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.89%

-16.09%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.37%

-37.00%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-0.96%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.11%

-13.26%

-3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

3.34%

-0.15%

Volatility

MEMQX vs. FPADX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mercer Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEMQX) is 6.11%, while Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that MEMQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEMQXFPADXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

7.71%

-1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.68%

15.44%

-1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.50%

17.83%

-1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.17%

17.11%

+1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.62%

17.82%

+1.80%

MEMQX vs. FPADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEMQX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FPADX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEMQX vs. FPADX - Dividend Comparison

MEMQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than FPADX's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPADX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund
1.83%2.35%2.70%2.68%2.47%2.14%1.50%2.59%2.20%0.12%1.69%2.47%
MEMQX
Mercer Emerging Markets Equity Fund
2.27%2.88%1.64%2.35%2.57%13.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEMQX and FPADX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPADX has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to MEMQX (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEMQX dropped -40.09% vs FPADX's -39.16%.

MEMQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.64 vs 3.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEMQX and FPADX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer