MEMQX vs. MSCGX
MEMQX (Mercer Emerging Markets Equity Fund) and MSCGX (Mercer US Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - MEMQX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Mercer Funds, while MSCGX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Mercer Funds. Over the past 5 years, MEMQX returned 5.27%/yr vs 7.50%/yr for MSCGX. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MEMQX charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for MSCGX.
Performance
MEMQX vs. MSCGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MEMQX achieves a 28.57% return, which is significantly higher than MSCGX's 15.68% return.
MEMQX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 6.38%
- YTD
- 28.57%
- 6M
- 30.06%
- 1Y
- 51.07%
- 3Y*
- 20.44%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- —
MSCGX
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 4.05%
- YTD
- 15.68%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- 1Y
- 26.03%
- 3Y*
- 16.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.50%
- 10Y*
- —
MEMQX vs. MSCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEMQX Mercer Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 28.57% | 31.07% | 2.00% | 7.16% | -24.30% | 0.23% | 13.55% | 4.31% |
MSCGX Mercer US Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund | 15.68% | 6.52% | 13.39% | 15.35% | -16.91% | 24.32% | 12.40% | 5.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between MEMQX and MSCGX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019 | 0.54 |
The correlation between MEMQX and MSCGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MEMQX vs. MSCGX — Risk / Return Rank
MEMQX
MSCGX
MEMQX vs. MSCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mercer Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEMQX) and Mercer US Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund (MSCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MEMQX | MSCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.33 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.61 | 3.41 | +1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.26 | 12.29 | +3.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MEMQX vs. MSCGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEMQX drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, roughly equal to the maximum MSCGX drawdown of -41.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEMQX and MSCGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEMQX | MSCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.09% | -41.30% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.37% | -9.22% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.89% | -24.28% | +7.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.37% | -35.66% | -3.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.01% | -12.65% | -4.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 2.47% | +0.85% |
Volatility
MEMQX vs. MSCGX - Volatility Comparison
Mercer Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEMQX) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to Mercer US Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund (MSCGX) at 4.56%. This indicates that MEMQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MEMQX | MSCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.45% | 4.56% | +3.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.60% | 11.83% | +3.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.26% | 16.23% | +2.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.50% | 23.85% | -5.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 25.44% | -5.67% |
MEMQX vs. MSCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MEMQX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than MSCGX's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
MEMQX vs. MSCGX - Dividend Comparison
MEMQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than MSCGX's 6.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEMQX Mercer Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 2.24% | 2.88% | 1.64% | 2.35% | 2.57% | 13.11% |
MSCGX Mercer US Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund | 6.66% | 7.71% | 10.73% | 3.77% | 8.42% | 20.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMQX and MSCGX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MEMQX has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to MSCGX (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEMQX dropped -40.09% vs MSCGX's -41.30%.
MEMQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MEMQX and MSCGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer