MEM vs. DEM
MEM (Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF) and DEM (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Matthews, while DEM is a Dividend fund tracking the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Index. MEM is actively managed, while DEM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MEM returned 19.44%/yr vs 17.15%/yr for DEM. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MEM charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for DEM.
Performance
MEM vs. DEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MEM achieves a 19.84% return, which is significantly higher than DEM's 17.69% return.
MEM
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- 6M
- 9.62%
- YTD
- 19.84%
- 1Y
- 37.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.74%
DEM
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- YTD
- 17.69%
- 1Y
- 25.38%
- 3Y*
- 17.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.09%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.16M | $9.32M | $10.88M | |
| $115.09K | $118.00K | $130.93K |
MEM vs. DEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEM Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF | 19.84% | 28.31% | 10.11% | 6.92% | 7.13% |
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 17.69% | 21.29% | 4.46% | 20.93% | 5.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between MEM and DEM is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022 | 0.82 |
The correlation between MEM and DEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
MEM vs. DEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MEM
DEM
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
MEM
DEM
Financial Services
MEM
DEM
Industrials
MEM
DEM
Basic Materials
MEM
DEM
Consumer Cyclical
MEM
DEM
Communication Services
MEM
DEM
Energy
MEM
DEM
Consumer Defensive
MEM
DEM
Healthcare
MEM
DEM
Real Estate
MEM
-
DEM
Utilities
MEM
-
DEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MEM vs. DEM — Risk / Return Rank
MEM
DEM
MEM vs. DEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (MEM) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MEM | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.31 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 3.23 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.35 | 9.72 | -2.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MEM vs. DEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEM drawdown since its inception was -19.10%, smaller than the maximum DEM drawdown of -51.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEM and DEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEM | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.10% | -51.85% | +32.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.62% | -7.89% | -6.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.10% | -15.64% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.45% | -3.06% | -6.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.84% | -12.82% | +7.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.13% | 2.62% | +2.51% |
Volatility
MEM vs. DEM - Volatility Comparison
Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (MEM) has a higher volatility of 8.36% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) at 5.13%. This indicates that MEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MEM | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.36% | 5.13% | +3.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.33% | 13.19% | +9.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.98% | 15.02% | +9.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.36% | 15.61% | +3.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.36% | 17.86% | +1.50% |
MEM vs. DEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MEM has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DEM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
MEM vs. DEM - Dividend Comparison
MEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, less than DEM's 4.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 4.16% | 4.88% | 5.24% | 5.49% | 8.62% | 5.87% | 4.21% | 4.78% | 4.47% | 3.67% | 3.63% | 5.21% |
MEM Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF | 2.97% | 3.56% | 7.81% | 0.01% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MEM and DEM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MEM has higher volatility (8.36%) compared to DEM (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEM dropped -19.10% vs DEM's -51.85%.
On 3-year performance, MEM leads with 19.44% vs 17.15% for DEM. On fees, DEM is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, DEM has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MEM has performed better with a 19.44% return vs 17.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DEM is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MEM.
DEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 2.97% for MEM.
MEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DEM is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Matthews and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MEM and 0.63% for DEM.
DEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MEM and DEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer