PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEL.MC vs. KER.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MEL.MC vs. KER.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Meliá Hotels International, S.A. (MEL.MC) and Kering SA (KER.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEL.MC achieves a 40.78% return, which is significantly higher than KER.PA's -18.02% return. Over the past 10 years, MEL.MC has underperformed KER.PA with an annualized return of 0.86%, while KER.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 8.15% annualized return.


MEL.MC

1D
0.36%
1M
0.63%
YTD
40.78%
6M
53.90%
1Y
67.60%
3Y*
22.82%
5Y*
10.44%
10Y*
0.86%

KER.PA

1D
-4.07%
1M
8.16%
YTD
-18.02%
6M
-16.04%
1Y
43.97%
3Y*
-19.40%
5Y*
-17.69%
10Y*
8.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEL.MC vs. KER.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MEL.MC
Meliá Hotels International, S.A.
40.78%9.27%24.78%30.19%-23.73%4.93%-27.23%-2.59%-27.74%4.66%
KER.PA
Kering SA
-18.02%30.28%-37.75%-14.00%-31.24%20.44%3.11%45.37%14.15%87.50%

Correlation

The correlation between MEL.MC and KER.PA is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 1996

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEL.MC vs. KER.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEL.MC
MEL.MC Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MEL.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEL.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEL.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
MEL.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEL.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

KER.PA
KER.PA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
KER.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KER.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
KER.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
KER.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
KER.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEL.MC vs. KER.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meliá Hotels International, S.A. (MEL.MC) and Kering SA (KER.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEL.MCKER.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.20

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

1.28

+2.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.02

2.59

+7.43

MEL.MC vs. KER.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEL.MC Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the KER.PA Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEL.MC and KER.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEL.MCKER.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

1.04

+1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

-0.49

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

0.24

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.30

-0.24

Drawdowns

MEL.MC vs. KER.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEL.MC drawdown since its inception was -90.94%, which is greater than KER.PA's maximum drawdown of -85.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEL.MC and KER.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEL.MCKER.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.94%

-85.03%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.59%

-33.86%

+17.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.44%

-69.52%

+43.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.00%

-78.17%

+29.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.49%

-78.17%

-1.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.48%

-64.92%

+32.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.08%

-30.30%

-16.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.69%

16.85%

-10.16%

Volatility

MEL.MC vs. KER.PA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Meliá Hotels International, S.A. (MEL.MC) is 6.39%, while Kering SA (KER.PA) has a volatility of 12.58%. This indicates that MEL.MC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KER.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEL.MCKER.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.39%

12.58%

-6.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.99%

29.42%

-9.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.28%

41.64%

-16.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.31%

35.38%

-4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.75%

32.92%

+4.83%

Dividends

MEL.MC vs. KER.PA - Dividend Comparison

MEL.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than KER.PA's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KER.PA
Kering SA
1.23%1.99%5.88%3.51%2.52%1.13%1.35%1.79%1.42%1.17%1.88%2.53%
MEL.MC
Meliá Hotels International, S.A.
1.04%1.47%1.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.89%1.66%0.93%0.29%0.20%

Financials

MEL.MC vs. KER.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Meliá Hotels International, S.A. and Kering SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MEL.MC and KER.PA have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEL.MC and KER.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer