PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEIAX vs. MTLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEIAX vs. MTLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Value Fund (MEIAX) and MFS Municipal Limited Maturity Fund (MTLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEIAX achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly higher than MTLFX's 0.16% return. Over the past 10 years, MEIAX has outperformed MTLFX with an annualized return of 9.90%, while MTLFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.94% annualized return.


MEIAX

1D
0.39%
1M
1.20%
6M
6.86%
YTD
10.34%
1Y
18.52%
3Y*
12.81%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
9.90%
ALL TIME*
10.07%

MTLFX

1D
-0.13%
1M
-1.12%
6M
-0.60%
YTD
0.16%
1Y
2.61%
3Y*
4.07%
5Y*
1.46%
10Y*
1.94%
ALL TIME*
3.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MEIAX vs. MTLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MEIAX
MFS Value Fund
10.34%12.97%11.60%7.92%-6.25%25.11%3.71%29.73%-10.11%16.97%
MTLFX
MFS Municipal Limited Maturity Fund
0.16%6.04%3.41%4.36%-5.65%0.70%3.27%5.50%1.28%3.24%

Correlation

The correlation between MEIAX and MTLFX is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 1995

-0.04

The correlation between MEIAX and MTLFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.14 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEIAX vs. MTLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MEIAX
MEIAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MEIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MEIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

MTLFX
MTLFX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
MTLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
MTLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MEIAX vs. MTLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Value Fund (MEIAX) and MFS Municipal Limited Maturity Fund (MTLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MEIAXMTLFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.46

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

1.52

+0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.30

4.31

+4.00

MEIAX vs. MTLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the MTLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEIAX and MTLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MEIAX vs. MTLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEIAX drawdown since its inception was -52.85%, which is greater than MTLFX's maximum drawdown of -8.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEIAX and MTLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEIAXMTLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.85%

-8.98%

-43.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.78%

-2.08%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.26%

-2.50%

-10.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.72%

-8.66%

-9.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.71%

-8.98%

-27.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-1.44%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.51%

-0.88%

-5.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

0.73%

+1.22%

Volatility

MEIAX vs. MTLFX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Value Fund (MEIAX) has a higher volatility of 2.76% compared to MFS Municipal Limited Maturity Fund (MTLFX) at 0.53%. This indicates that MEIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEIAXMTLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

0.53%

+2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.50%

1.53%

+5.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.58%

1.89%

+8.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

2.26%

+11.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.47%

2.51%

+13.96%

MEIAX vs. MTLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEIAX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than MTLFX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEIAX vs. MTLFX - Dividend Comparison

MEIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.60%, more than MTLFX's 2.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEIAX
MFS Value Fund
8.60%9.34%9.10%8.21%7.36%3.10%2.42%2.97%3.36%3.87%2.84%5.73%
MTLFX
MFS Municipal Limited Maturity Fund
2.86%4.06%3.34%2.32%1.13%1.30%1.75%2.27%2.13%2.07%1.95%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEIAX and MTLFX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MEIAX has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to MTLFX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEIAX dropped -52.85% vs MTLFX's -8.98%.

MTLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEIAX and MTLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer