MTLFX vs. GTDDX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Municipal Limited Maturity Fund (MTLFX) and Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX).
MTLFX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Mar 16, 1992. GTDDX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Jan 10, 1994.
Performance
MTLFX vs. GTDDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MTLFX vs. GTDDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTLFX MFS Municipal Limited Maturity Fund | -0.49% | 6.04% | 3.41% | 4.36% | -5.65% | 0.70% | 3.27% | 5.50% | 1.28% | 3.24% |
GTDDX Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd | 3.95% | 29.88% | -0.66% | 8.82% | -17.70% | -7.00% | 17.19% | 29.99% | -18.77% | 30.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTLFX achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly lower than GTDDX's 3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, MTLFX has underperformed GTDDX with an annualized return of 2.01%, while GTDDX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.97% annualized return.
MTLFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.08%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 3.78%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- 1.61%
- 10Y*
- 2.01%
GTDDX
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -14.05%
- YTD
- 3.95%
- 6M
- 13.80%
- 1Y
- 32.94%
- 3Y*
- 10.56%
- 5Y*
- 2.18%
- 10Y*
- 6.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MTLFX vs. GTDDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MTLFX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GTDDX's 1.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MTLFX vs. GTDDX — Risk / Return Rank
MTLFX
GTDDX
MTLFX vs. GTDDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Municipal Limited Maturity Fund (MTLFX) and Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MTLFX | GTDDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.65 | 1.79 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.32 | 2.31 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.34 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 2.16 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.57 | 8.81 | -1.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MTLFX | GTDDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.79 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.14 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.42 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.52 | 0.29 | +1.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between MTLFX and GTDDX is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
MTLFX vs. GTDDX - Dividend Comparison
MTLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than GTDDX's 20.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTLFX MFS Municipal Limited Maturity Fund | 3.09% | 4.06% | 3.34% | 2.32% | 1.13% | 1.30% | 1.75% | 2.27% | 2.13% | 2.07% | 1.95% | 1.75% |
GTDDX Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd | 20.32% | 21.13% | 1.16% | 1.51% | 1.17% | 4.46% | 5.05% | 1.49% | 1.53% | 0.71% | 0.86% | 0.99% |
Drawdowns
MTLFX vs. GTDDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTLFX drawdown since its inception was -8.98%, smaller than the maximum GTDDX drawdown of -62.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTLFX and GTDDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTLFX | GTDDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.98% | -62.89% | +53.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.50% | -14.49% | +11.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.66% | -37.56% | +28.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.98% | -39.58% | +30.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -14.49% | +12.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.88% | -18.84% | +17.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.62% | 3.55% | -2.93% |
Volatility
MTLFX vs. GTDDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Municipal Limited Maturity Fund (MTLFX) is 0.77%, while Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX) has a volatility of 9.45%. This indicates that MTLFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTDDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MTLFX | GTDDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.77% | 9.45% | -8.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.29% | 14.20% | -12.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80% | 18.20% | -15.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.21% | 15.63% | -13.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.50% | 16.58% | -14.08% |