PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTLFX vs. MINIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MTLFX vs. MINIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Municipal Limited Maturity Fund (MTLFX) and MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTLFX achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than MINIX's 9.12% return. Over the past 10 years, MTLFX has underperformed MINIX with an annualized return of 1.94%, while MINIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.19% annualized return.


MTLFX

1D
-0.13%
1M
-1.12%
6M
-0.60%
YTD
0.16%
1Y
2.61%
3Y*
4.07%
5Y*
1.46%
10Y*
1.94%
ALL TIME*
3.20%

MINIX

1D
2.25%
1M
3.06%
6M
4.42%
YTD
9.12%
1Y
22.97%
3Y*
16.87%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
10.19%
ALL TIME*
9.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MTLFX vs. MINIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTLFX
MFS Municipal Limited Maturity Fund
0.16%6.04%3.41%4.36%-5.65%0.70%3.27%5.50%1.28%3.24%
MINIX
MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I
9.12%33.06%7.35%18.04%-23.05%10.55%20.45%25.90%-9.02%27.14%

Correlation

The correlation between MTLFX and MINIX is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1996

-0.01

The correlation between MTLFX and MINIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTLFX vs. MINIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MTLFX
MTLFX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
MTLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
MTLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

MINIX
MINIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MINIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
MINIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MTLFX vs. MINIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Municipal Limited Maturity Fund (MTLFX) and MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MTLFXMINIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.25

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

1.70

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.31

5.60

-1.29

MTLFX vs. MINIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTLFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the MINIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTLFX and MINIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTLFX vs. MINIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTLFX drawdown since its inception was -8.98%, smaller than the maximum MINIX drawdown of -51.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTLFX and MINIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTLFXMINIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.98%

-51.72%

+42.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.08%

-12.42%

+10.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.50%

-13.59%

+11.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.66%

-36.78%

+28.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.98%

-36.78%

+27.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-0.61%

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-8.59%

+7.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

3.76%

-3.03%

Volatility

MTLFX vs. MINIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Municipal Limited Maturity Fund (MTLFX) is 0.53%, while MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that MTLFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MINIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTLFXMINIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

3.96%

-3.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.53%

12.21%

-10.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89%

14.65%

-12.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.26%

16.79%

-14.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.51%

15.52%

-13.01%

MTLFX vs. MINIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTLFX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than MINIX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

MTLFX vs. MINIX - Dividend Comparison

MTLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, less than MINIX's 7.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MINIX
MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I
7.12%7.77%12.02%11.21%13.90%7.25%5.25%3.94%4.49%2.62%1.82%3.20%
MTLFX
MFS Municipal Limited Maturity Fund
2.86%4.06%3.34%2.32%1.13%1.30%1.75%2.27%2.13%2.07%1.95%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


MTLFX and MINIX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MINIX has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to MTLFX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTLFX dropped -8.98% vs MINIX's -51.72%.

MTLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTLFX and MINIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer