PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEGIX vs. CTCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEGIX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio (MEGIX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEGIX achieves a -1.13% return, which is significantly lower than CTCAX's 32.06% return.


MEGIX

1D
-1.57%
1M
4.37%
YTD
-1.13%
6M
-3.24%
1Y
8.29%
3Y*
32.57%
5Y*
2.96%
10Y*

CTCAX

1D
1.47%
1M
17.00%
YTD
32.06%
6M
31.15%
1Y
61.81%
3Y*
36.07%
5Y*
20.96%
10Y*
24.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEGIX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MEGIX
Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio
-1.13%35.72%46.59%48.66%-60.94%-0.20%117.49%31.82%7.73%19.35%
CTCAX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A
32.06%24.78%31.39%56.46%-34.81%22.73%49.46%43.91%-1.48%33.98%

Correlation

The correlation between MEGIX and CTCAX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.78

The correlation between MEGIX and CTCAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEGIX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEGIX
MEGIX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MEGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
MEGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

CTCAX
CTCAX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CTCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CTCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEGIX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio (MEGIX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEGIXCTCAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.49

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

4.43

-4.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.69

16.56

-15.87

MEGIX vs. CTCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the CTCAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEGIX and CTCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEGIXCTCAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

3.04

-2.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.81

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.78

-0.29

Drawdowns

MEGIX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEGIX drawdown since its inception was -69.99%, which is greater than CTCAX's maximum drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEGIX and CTCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEGIXCTCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.99%

-61.04%

-8.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.03%

-14.43%

-13.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.12%

-26.67%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.99%

-39.55%

-30.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.94%

0.00%

-11.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.05%

-10.68%

-12.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.99%

3.86%

+9.13%

Volatility

MEGIX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio (MEGIX) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) at 6.37%. This indicates that MEGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEGIXCTCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.29%

6.37%

+1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.65%

16.72%

+4.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.17%

21.06%

+7.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.80%

25.98%

+13.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.70%

24.84%

+9.86%

MEGIX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEGIX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEGIX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison

MEGIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CTCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTCAX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A
2.49%3.29%1.08%2.36%3.53%4.15%0.91%2.55%5.82%3.52%0.36%1.80%
MEGIX
Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%163.32%34.82%7.97%5.35%24.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEGIX and CTCAX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MEGIX has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to CTCAX (6.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEGIX dropped -69.99% vs CTCAX's -61.04%.

CTCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEGIX and CTCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer