MEFAX vs. MMGPX
MEFAX (MassMutual Mid Cap Growth Fund) and MMGPX (Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MEFAX returned 2.28%/yr vs -6.35%/yr for MMGPX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MEFAX charges 1.20%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for MMGPX.
Performance
MEFAX vs. MMGPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MEFAX achieves a 5.92% return, which is significantly higher than MMGPX's 2.60% return.
MEFAX
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 5.92%
- 1Y
- 8.05%
- 3Y*
- 8.19%
- 5Y*
- 2.28%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
MMGPX
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- 6M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 2.60%
- 1Y
- -3.73%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- -6.35%
- 10Y*
- —
MEFAX vs. MMGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEFAX MassMutual Mid Cap Growth Fund | 5.92% | 3.19% | 10.80% | 19.11% | -24.58% | 13.75% | 25.52% | 40.75% | -3.88% | 20.01% |
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | 2.60% | 12.58% | 41.83% | 44.34% | -63.37% | -11.55% | 152.67% | 40.20% | 10.89% | 28.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between MEFAX and MMGPX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.76 |
The correlation between MEFAX and MMGPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MEFAX vs. MMGPX — Risk / Return Rank
MEFAX
MMGPX
MEFAX vs. MMGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Mid Cap Growth Fund (MEFAX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MEFAX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.99 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | -0.19 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.38 | -0.37 | +2.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MEFAX vs. MMGPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEFAX drawdown since its inception was -56.04%, smaller than the maximum MMGPX drawdown of -75.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEFAX and MMGPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEFAX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.04% | -75.38% | +19.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.45% | -27.79% | +17.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.46% | -29.27% | -5.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.14% | -72.70% | +27.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.70% | -38.69% | +24.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.44% | -30.34% | +18.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 13.99% | -11.11% |
Volatility
MEFAX vs. MMGPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MassMutual Mid Cap Growth Fund (MEFAX) is 4.92%, while Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) has a volatility of 7.19%. This indicates that MEFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MEFAX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 7.19% | -2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.94% | 21.67% | -9.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 28.47% | -13.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.53% | 39.82% | -12.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.90% | 35.16% | -11.26% |
MEFAX vs. MMGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MEFAX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MMGPX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
MEFAX vs. MMGPX - Dividend Comparison
MEFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.25%, while MMGPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEFAX MassMutual Mid Cap Growth Fund | 32.25% | 34.16% | 21.40% | 7.62% | 20.71% | 29.49% | 6.92% | 12.81% | 12.06% | 7.66% | 5.32% | 10.27% |
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 125.40% | 64.53% | 7.93% | 15.63% | 28.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MEFAX and MMGPX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMGPX has higher volatility (7.19%) compared to MEFAX (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEFAX dropped -56.04% vs MMGPX's -75.38%.
MEFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MEFAX and MMGPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer